Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28641402›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

EC-tagging allows cell type-specific RNA analysis.

Naoki Hida, Mohamed Y Aboukilila, Dana A Burow, Rakesh Paul, Marc M Greenberg, Michael Fazio, Samantha Beasley, Robert C Spitale, Michael D Cleary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. I-KCKT allows dissection-free RNA profiling of adultDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Covalent labeling of nucleic acids.Chemical Society reviews · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki HidaMolecular and Cell Biology Unit, Quantitative and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Mohamed Y AboukililaMolecular and Cell Biology Unit, Quantitative and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Dana A BurowMolecular and Cell Biology Unit, Quantitative and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Rakesh PaulDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Marc M GreenbergDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Michael FazioDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Samantha BeasleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Robert C SpitaleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Michael D ClearyMolecular and Cell Biology Unit, Quantitative and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
University of California, Merced · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Repair, Replication, and Detection of Oxidatively Damaged DNAR01GM063028 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, MARC M · 2002 to 2018
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purification of cell type-specific RNAs remains a significant challenge. One solution involves biosynthetic tagging of target RNAs. RNA tagging via incorporation of 4-thiouracil (TU) in cells expressing transgenic uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT), a method known as TU-tagging, has been used in multiple systems but can have limited specificity due to endogenous pathways of TU incorporation. Here, we describe an alternative method that requires the activity of two enzymes: cytosine deaminase (CD) and UPRT. We found that the sequential activity of these enzymes converts 5-ethynylcytosine (EC) to 5-ethynyluridine monophosphate that is subsequently incorporated into nascent RNAs. The ethynyl group allows efficient detection and purification of tagged RNAs. We show that 'EC-tagging' occurs in tissue culture cells and Drosophila engineered to express CD and UPRT. Additional control can be achieved through a split-CD approach in which functional CD is reconstituted from independently expressed fragments. We demonstrate the sensitivity and specificity of EC-tagging by obtaining cell type-specific gene expression data from intact Drosophila larvae, including transcriptome measurements from a small population of central brain neurons. EC-tagging provides several advantages over existing techniques and should be broadly useful for investigating the role of differential RNA expression in cell identity, physiology and pathology.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell LineageCells, CulturedCytosineCytosine DeaminaseDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingHeLa CellsHumansOrgan SpecificityPentosyltransferasesRNAStaining and Labeling5-ethynylcytosineCytosineCytosine DeaminasePentosyltransferasesRNAuracil phosphoribosyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID28641402
PMCPMC5587779
OpenAlexW2701582619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.