Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28640686›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of public health2017

Prevalence of Financial Fraud and Scams Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

David Burnes, Charles R Henderson, Christine Sheppard, Rebecca Zhao, Karl Pillemer, Mark S Lachs

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Age and Framing Effects in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David BurnesDavid Burnes is with the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Charles R. Henderson Jr is with the College of Human Ecology and Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Christine Sheppard is a PhD candidate with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Rebecca Zhao is with the Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Karl Pillemer is with the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca. Mark S. Lachs is with the Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
Charles R HendersonDavid Burnes is with the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Charles R. Henderson Jr is with the College of Human Ecology and Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Christine Sheppard is a PhD candidate with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Rebecca Zhao is with the Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Karl Pillemer is with the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca. Mark S. Lachs is with the Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
Christine SheppardDavid Burnes is with the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Charles R. Henderson Jr is with the College of Human Ecology and Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Christine Sheppard is a PhD candidate with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Rebecca Zhao is with the Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Karl Pillemer is with the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca. Mark S. Lachs is with the Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
Rebecca ZhaoDavid Burnes is with the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Charles R. Henderson Jr is with the College of Human Ecology and Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Christine Sheppard is a PhD candidate with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Rebecca Zhao is with the Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Karl Pillemer is with the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca. Mark S. Lachs is with the Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
Karl PillemerDavid Burnes is with the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Charles R. Henderson Jr is with the College of Human Ecology and Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Christine Sheppard is a PhD candidate with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Rebecca Zhao is with the Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Karl Pillemer is with the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca. Mark S. Lachs is with the Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
Mark S LachsDavid Burnes is with the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Charles R. Henderson Jr is with the College of Human Ecology and Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Christine Sheppard is a PhD candidate with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Rebecca Zhao is with the Faculty of Arts & Science, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto. Karl Pillemer is with the Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca. Mark S. Lachs is with the Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.

Funding

Mid Career Mentoring Award In Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AG022399 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LACHS, MARK STEVEN · 2003 to 2015
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG022399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe financial exploitation of older adults was recently recognized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a serious public health problem. Knowledge of the prevalence of elder financial exploitation is mostly limited to the category of financial abuse, which occurs in relationships involving an expectation of trust. Little is known about the other major category of elder financial exploitation-elder financial fraud and scams, which is perpetrated by strangers. A valid estimate of elder financial fraud-scam prevalence is necessary as a foundation for research and prevention efforts.

objectivesTo estimate the prevalence of elder financial fraud-scam victimization in the United States based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. SEARCH

methodsMultiple investigators independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed relevant full-text records from PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, Criminal Justice Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, and AgeLine databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: To maximize the validity and generalizability of prevalence estimation, we restricted eligibility to general population-based studies (English speaking, 1990 onward) using state- or national-level probability sampling and collecting data directly from older adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information on elder financial fraud-scam prevalence and study-level characteristics was extracted independently by 2 investigators. Meta-analysis of elder financial fraud-scam prevalence used generalized mixed models with individual studies as levels of a random classification factor. MAIN

resultsWe included 12 studies involving a total of 41 711 individuals in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled elder financial fraud-scam prevalence (up to 5-year period) across studies was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.0%, 7.8%), with a 1-year period prevalence of 5.4% (95% CI = 3.2%, 7.6%). Studies using a series of questions describing specific fraud-scam events to measure victimization found a significantly higher prevalence (7.1%; 95% CI = 4.8%, 9.4%) than studies using a single, general-question self-report assessment approach (3.6%; 95% CI = 1.8%, 5.4%). AUTHOR'S

conclusionsElder financial fraud and scams is a common problem, affecting approximately 1 of every 18 cognitively intact, community-dwelling older adults each year; it requires further attention from researchers, clinicians, and policymakers. Elder financial fraud-scam prevalence findings in this study likely underestimate the true population prevalence. We provide methodological recommendations to limit older adult participation and reporting bias in future population-based research. Public Health Implications. Elder financial exploitation victimization is associated with mortality, hospitalization, and poor physical and mental health. Health care professionals working with older adults likely routinely encounter patients who are fraud-scam victims. Validation of instruments to screen for elder financial fraud and scams in clinical settings is an important area of future research. Without effective primary prevention strategies, the absolute scope of this problem will escalate with the growing population of older adults.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsDeceptionAgedFraudHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28640686
PMCPMC5508139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.