SynthesisMedicine2017
Comparison of radiofrequency kyphoplasty (RFK) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Cement augmentation in spinal surgery].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Three generations of treatments for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: what is the evidence?Orthopedic reviews · 2022Article
- Article
- [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty : A critical statement].Der Radiologe · 2020Review
- The risk factors of vertebral refracture after kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a study protocol for a prospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a widely adopted minimally invasive treatment for vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), but leakage of cement is a main complication of BKP. A novel vertebral augmentation technique radiofrequency kyphoplasty (RFK) with high viscosity cement was developed in 2009. Here, we aim to evaluate whether RFK can relieve symptoms efficiently and reduce cement leakage.
methodsA literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL until September 30, 2016. Both randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT studies comparing RFK and BKP were included. The main outcomes included pain relief (VAS), functionality improvement (ODI), operation time, reduction of deformity (vertebral height and kyphosis angle), and incidence of cement leakage. The origin of heterogeneity was further explored by subgroup stratification.
resultsA total of 6 studies involving 833 patients with VCFs were included. The reduction of VAS score in the RFK group was 3.96 points more than that in the BKP group (P = .0007) postoperatively, and the improvement persisted until 12 months after the surgery (P < .00001). The operation time was shorter in RFK group than that in BKP group (P = .01). The increase of anterior vertebral height shortly after the operation was 0.53 mm greater in RFK group (P = .01). The decrease of kyphotic angle after RFK was 0.63° and 0.92° greater than that after BKP, both immediately and 6 months after operation (P = .002 and P < .00001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the incidence of cement leakage after RFK and BKP (P = .06). Further subgroup analysis stratified by study design indicated that the incidence of leakage decreased 15% in RFK than BPK (P < .00001) in non-RCT subgroup, but RFK and BKP treatments were equivalent in the RCT studies (P = .86).
conclusionRFK appears to be more effective and safer than BKP in the present meta-analysis. The incidence of cement leakage diverges in RCT and non-RCT studies, so large-sample multicentered RCT studies are required to validate this new surgery system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.