Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28640021›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2017

Identifying Distinct Subgroups of ICU Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.

Kelly C Vranas, Jeffrey K Jopling, Timothy E Sweeney, Meghan C Ramsey, Arnold S Milstein, Christopher G Slatore, Gabriel J Escobar, Vincent X Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Role of artificial intelligence in critical care nutrition support and research.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Explainable hierarchical clustering for patient subtyping and risk prediction.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. AI in Rehabilitation Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly C Vranas1Department of Medicine, Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 3Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 4Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 5Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. 6Health Services Research and Development, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR. 7Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Jeffrey K Jopling
Timothy E Sweeney
Meghan C Ramsey
Arnold S Milstein
Christopher G Slatore
Gabriel J Escobar
Vincent X Liu
Stanford University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Multidisciplinary Research Training in Pulmonary MedicineT32HL083808 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LEWINSOHN, DAVID M., SLATORE, CHRISTOPHER G. · 2008 to 2025
$5.3M
Data-driven Precision medicine in sepsisK23GM112018 · NIGMS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LIU, VINCENT · 2014 to 2017
$768k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL083808NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM112018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIdentifying subgroups of ICU patients with similar clinical needs and trajectories may provide a framework for more efficient ICU care through the design of care platforms tailored around patients' shared needs. However, objective methods for identifying these ICU patient subgroups are lacking. We used a machine learning approach to empirically identify ICU patient subgroups through clustering analysis and evaluate whether these groups might represent appropriate targets for care redesign efforts.

designWe performed clustering analysis using data from patients' hospital stays to retrospectively identify patient subgroups from a large, heterogeneous ICU population.

settingKaiser Permanente Northern California, a healthcare delivery system serving 3.9 million members. PATIENTS: ICU patients 18 years old or older with an ICU admission between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, at one of 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWe used clustering analysis to identify putative clusters among 5,000 patients randomly selected from 24,884 ICU patients. To assess cluster validity, we evaluated the distribution and frequency of patient characteristics and the need for invasive therapies. We then applied a classifier built from the sample cohort to the remaining 19,884 patients to compare the derivation and validation clusters. Clustering analysis successfully identified six clinically recognizable subgroups that differed significantly in all baseline characteristics and clinical trajectories, despite sharing common diagnoses. In the validation cohort, the proportion of patients assigned to each cluster was similar and demonstrated significant differences across clusters for all variables.

conclusionsA machine learning approach revealed important differences between empirically derived subgroups of ICU patients that are not typically revealed by admitting diagnosis or severity of illness alone. Similar data-driven approaches may provide a framework for future organizational innovations in ICU care tailored around patients' shared needs.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisCritical CareIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningAgedCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28640021
PMCPMC5600667
OpenAlexW2919041980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.