ArticleCritical care medicine2017
Identifying Distinct Subgroups of ICU Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Research Agenda for Precision Medicine in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Guideline
- Artificial intelligence and laboratory biomarkers in veterinary medicine: an update about machine learning applications.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Review
- Contrastive Transformer-Driven Discovery of Temporal Hemodynamic Subphenotypes in Cardiac Surgery Patients.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A step-by-step protocol based on data mining to explore purinergic signaling in glioblastoma.Purinergic signalling · 2025Article
- ARDS Subphenotypes as a Guide to Therapy and Enrollment into Therapeutic Trials: Not So Fast.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sepsis subphenotypes: bridging the gaps in sepsis treatment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in critical care nutrition support and research.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2024Review
- Review
- Deep embedded clustering generalisability and adaptation for integrating mixed datatypes: two critical care cohorts.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Explainable hierarchical clustering for patient subtyping and risk prediction.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Article
- AI in Rehabilitation Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes in Critically Ill Patients.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- A scoping review of the clinical application of machine learning in data-driven population segmentation analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Clustering of clinical and echocardiographic phenotypes of covid-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Novel architecture for gated recurrent unit autoencoder trained on time series from electronic health records enables detection of ICU patient subgroups.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Absence of Serious Bacterial Infection at PICU Admission.Hospital pediatrics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Outcomes Following Hospital-Wide Implementation of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol for Diabetic Ketoacidosis.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Phenotype clustering in health care: A narrative review for clinicians.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIdentifying subgroups of ICU patients with similar clinical needs and trajectories may provide a framework for more efficient ICU care through the design of care platforms tailored around patients' shared needs. However, objective methods for identifying these ICU patient subgroups are lacking. We used a machine learning approach to empirically identify ICU patient subgroups through clustering analysis and evaluate whether these groups might represent appropriate targets for care redesign efforts.
designWe performed clustering analysis using data from patients' hospital stays to retrospectively identify patient subgroups from a large, heterogeneous ICU population.
settingKaiser Permanente Northern California, a healthcare delivery system serving 3.9 million members. PATIENTS: ICU patients 18 years old or older with an ICU admission between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, at one of 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsWe used clustering analysis to identify putative clusters among 5,000 patients randomly selected from 24,884 ICU patients. To assess cluster validity, we evaluated the distribution and frequency of patient characteristics and the need for invasive therapies. We then applied a classifier built from the sample cohort to the remaining 19,884 patients to compare the derivation and validation clusters. Clustering analysis successfully identified six clinically recognizable subgroups that differed significantly in all baseline characteristics and clinical trajectories, despite sharing common diagnoses. In the validation cohort, the proportion of patients assigned to each cluster was similar and demonstrated significant differences across clusters for all variables.
conclusionsA machine learning approach revealed important differences between empirically derived subgroups of ICU patients that are not typically revealed by admitting diagnosis or severity of illness alone. Similar data-driven approaches may provide a framework for future organizational innovations in ICU care tailored around patients' shared needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.