Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28639846›Full record

GuidelineActa orthopaedica2017

Antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated prior to dental procedures for prevention of periprosthetic joint infections.

Willem M H Rademacher, Geert H I M Walenkamp, Dirk Jan F Moojen, Johannes G E Hendriks, Theo A Goedendorp, Frederik R Rozema

Open access · goldAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Acta orthopaedica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Willem M H Rademachera Department of Oral Medicine , Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA).
Geert H I M Walenkampb Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Research Institute CAPHRI , Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht.
Dirk Jan F Moojenc Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology , OLVG , Amsterdam.
Johannes G E Hendriksd Department of Orthopaedics Greater Eindhoven , Máxima Medical Centre and Catharina Hospital , Eindhoven.
Theo A Goedendorpe The Royal Dutch Dental Organisation , Nieuwegein , the Netherlands.
Frederik R Rozemaa Department of Oral Medicine , Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA).
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLOLVG · NLRoyal Dutch Society for the Promotion of Dentistry · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - To minimize the risk of hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (HPJI), international and Dutch guidelines recommended antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures. Unclear definitions and contradictory recommendations in these guidelines have led to unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. To formulate new guidelines, a joint committee of the Dutch Orthopaedic and Dental Societies conducted a systematic literature review to answer the following question: can antibiotic prophylaxis be recommended for patients (with joint prostheses) undergoing dental procedures in order to prevent dental HPJI? Methods - The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reviews, and observational studies up to July 2015. Studies were included if they involved patients with joint implants undergoing dental procedures, and either considered HPJI as an outcome measure or described a correlation between HPJI and prophylactic antibiotics. A guideline was formulated using the GRADE method and AGREE II guidelines. Results - 9 studies were included in this systematic review. All were rated "very low quality of evidence". Additional literature was therefore consulted to address clinical questions that provide further insight into pathophysiology and risk factors. The 9 studies did not provide evidence that use of antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of dental HPJI, and the additional literature supported the conclusion that antibiotic prophylaxis should be discouraged in dental procedures. Interpretation - Prophylactic antibiotics in order to prevent dental HPJI should not be prescribed to patients with a normal or an impaired immune system function. Patients are recommended to maintain good oral hygiene and visit the dentist regularly.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisDental CareHumansJoint ProsthesisNetherlandsProsthesis-Related InfectionsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28639846
PMCPMC5560223
OpenAlexW2686198614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.