Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28639813›Full record

ReviewPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2017

Contingency management interventions for tobacco and other substance use disorders in pregnancy.

Dennis J Hand, Jennifer D Ellis, Meagan M Carr, Diane J Abatemarco, David M Ledgerwood

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Maternal schizophrenia and adverse birth outcomes: what mediates the risk?Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis J HandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University.
Jennifer D EllisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Meagan M CarrDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Diane J AbatemarcoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University.
David M LedgerwoodDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University.
Wayne State College · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Behavioral Smoking Cessation Treatment for People Living with HIV/AIDSR01DA034537 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LEDGERWOOD, DAVID M · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
Prize Reinforcement for Smoking CessationR21DA021839 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LEDGERWOOD, DAVID M · 2007 to 2008
$410k
National Institutes of HealthNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034537NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA021839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contingency management (CM) is an effective intervention for reducing use of licit and illicit substances in a variety of populations. Pregnant women are a vulnerable population with much to gain from effective interventions for substance use disorders, and for whom CM interventions may be especially well-suited. We reviewed the literature on CM interventions among pregnant women with tobacco and other substance use disorders with 3 aims: (a) describe the effectiveness of CM for reducing use of tobacco and other substances during pregnancy, (b) describe the effects of CM interventions on infant outcomes, and (c) identify needs for future research on CM in pregnancy. Our search strategy revealed 27 primary studies of CM in pregnancy. CM was effective in the majority of studies targeting nicotine abstinence, and results were mixed in studies targeting illicit substances. A variety of methodologies were used within the relatively small number of studies making it difficult to identify underlying mechanisms. Also, very few studies reported maternal and infant outcomes, and significant effects of CM were only apparent when secondary analyses pooled data from multiple studies. Furthermore, there is extremely limited data on the cost effectiveness of CM interventions in pregnancy. Future research should address these 3 areas to better determine the ultimate value of CM as an efficacious treatment for pregnant women with substance use disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyFemaleHumansMaternal-Fetal ExchangePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSubstance-Related DisordersTobacco SmokingTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28639813
PMCPMC5714659
OpenAlexW2647424185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.