Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28639486›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2017

Estimated Prevalence of the Target Population for Brain-Computer Interface Neurotechnology in the Netherlands.

Elmar G M Pels, Erik J Aarnoutse, Nick F Ramsey, Mariska J Vansteensel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02224469 (Utrecht Neural Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02224469 nacompletednot on this map

Utrecht Neural Prosthesis (UNP): A Pilot Study on Controllability of Brain Signals and Application in locked-in Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2015 to 2024Enrolled6ConditionsLocked-In SyndromeArmsECoG (electrocorticography) sensing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The speech neuroprosthesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stability of a chronic implanted brain-computer interface in late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elmar G M Pels1 Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Erik J Aarnoutse1 Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nick F Ramsey1 Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mariska J Vansteensel1 Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

European Research Council 320708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who suffer from paralysis have difficulties participating in society. Particularly burdensome is the locked-in syndrome (LIS). LIS patients are not able to move and speak but are cognitively healthy. They rely on assistive technology to interact with the world and may benefit from neurotechnological advances. Optimal research and design of such aids requires a well-defined target population. However, the LIS population is poorly characterized and the number of patients in this condition is unknown.

objectiveHere we estimated and described the LIS patient population in the Netherlands to define the target population for assistive (neuro)technology.

methodsWe asked physicians in the Netherlands if they had patients suffering from severe paralysis and communication problems in their files. Physicians responding affirmatively were asked to fill out a questionnaire on the patients' status.

resultsWe sent out 9570 letters to general practitioners (GPs), who reported 83 patients. After first screening, the GPs of 46 patients received the questionnaire. Based on the responses, 26 patients were classified as having LIS. Extrapolation of these numbers resulted in a prevalence of 0.73 patients per 100 000 inhabitants. Notable results from the questionnaire were the percentage of patients with neuromuscular disease (>50%) and living at home (>70%).

conclusionsWe revealed an etiologically diverse group of LIS patients. The functioning and needs of these patients were, however, similar and many relied on assistive technology. By characterizing the LIS population, our study may contribute to optimal development of assistive (neuro)technology.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesNeurological RehabilitationAdultAgedCommunication Devices for People with DisabilitiesCommunication DisordersFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNeuromuscular DiseasesParalysisPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnairesassistive technologybrain-computer interfacebrain-stem strokelocked-in-syndromeneuromuscular diseaseprevalence

Identifiers

PMID28639486
PMCPMC6396873
OpenAlexW2654988205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.