Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28639230›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterials and Their Clinical Implications.

Federico Pea

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. ChronicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations?Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federico PeaInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital of Udine, P.le S. Maria della Misericordia 3, 33100, Udine, Italy. federico.pea@asuiud.sanita.fvg.it.
Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intracellular pharmacokinetics of the different classes of antimicrobials into surrogate markers of tissue accumulation (alveolar macrophages and/or total alveolar cells collected by means of bronchoalveolar lavage or peripheral white blood cells) was reviewed. The aim of this review was to discuss the clinical implications of the intracellular pharmacokinetics of antibacterials, either from the therapeutic or toxicological perspective. The different pharmacokinetic behaviour of antimicrobials within cells is mainly related to their physicochemical properties (hydrophilicity and lipophilicity), and may have several clinical implications. Therapeutic efficacy against intracellular pathogens has been correlated mainly with the intracellular concentrations achieved by the different antimicrobial agents. This is relevant especially for macrolides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones and rifampicin in the treatment of bacterial infections such as Legionella pneumophila pneumonia, Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, non-gonococcal urethritis and chronic staphylococcal infections. Additionally, intracellular accumulation of antibacterials was correlated with the possibility of causing organ-specific toxicity, as in the case of aminoglycosides in regard to the risk of nephrotoxicity. Finally, it should be kept in mind that intracellular accumulation may also represent a drug reservoir in the case of lipophilic antimicrobials. This may become extremely relevant from the clinical standpoint when treating critically ill patients with sepsis with antibacterials. The pathophysiology of sepsis may explain why it is necessary to start therapy with an increased loading dose of hydrophilic antimicrobials to promptly achieve therapeutically effective concentrations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsSepsisTissue DistributionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28639230
OpenAlexW2707873570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.