ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2017
Serrated Polyps of Colon and Rectum: a Clinicopathologic Review.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic impact of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism on the susceptibility to colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis.BMC medical genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Colorectal polyp risk is linked to an elevated level of homocysteine.Bioscience reports · 2018Pooled it
- Dysbiosis promotes recurrence of adenomatous polyps in the distal colorectum.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Involvement of parathyroid hormone-related peptide in the aggressive phenotype of colorectal cancer cells.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Hyperplastic polyp or sessile serrated lesion? The contribution of serial sections to reclassification.Diagnostic pathology · 2020Article
- Important Role of Health Surveillance Systems in Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.The oncologist · 2018Article
- MicroRNA hsa-let-7e-5p as a potential prognosis marker for rectal carcinoma with liver metastases.Oncology letters · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the past decade, there have been significant changes in the classification and nomenclature of colorectal polyps. Previously, only two groups of lesions were widely recognized, the adenoma and the hyperplastic polyp. Adenomas were considered the only precursor of colorectal cancer, and hyperplastic polyps were considered innocent with no malignant potential. However, recent discoveries about molecular pathways of colorectal cancers have significantly changed our understanding of these neoplasms. Serrated polyps-previously uniformly called hyperplastic polyps-are now known to comprise a heterogeneous family of neoplasms united by their characteristic saw tooth morphology but differing in many important ways, including their malignant potential and molecular profile. This group of neoplasms includes both hyperplastic polyps and the more recently recognized serrated adenomas. Serrated adenomas can be subdivided into the traditional serrated adenoma and the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp. Both of these lesions show characteristic molecular changes, which differ from traditional colorectal adenomatous polyps.
objectivesIn this review, we will discuss the morphologic features of serrated colorectal lesions, the molecular alterations that characterize them, and their role in colorectal cancer development. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe English literature regarding the new nomenclature will be reviewed and the key diagnostic points will be recorded. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This large group of polyps has recently been better classified which needs specific attention by pathologists, gastroenterologists and even surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.