Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28639117›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018

Tubeless outpatient robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction in the pediatric population: short-term assessment of safety.

Eric J Fichtenbaum, Andrew C Strine, Charles W Concodora, Marion Schulte, Paul H Noh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive factors for early discharge (≤24 hours) and re-admission following robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric J FichtenbaumDivision of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC5037, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. fichtenbaum.1ej@gmail.com.
Andrew C StrineDivision of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC5037, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Charles W ConcodoraDivision of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC5037, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Marion SchulteDivision of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC5037, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Paul H NohDivision of Pediatric Urology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave MLC5037, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic upper urinary tract reconstruction (UUTR) has been widely utilized for surgical management of congenital obstruction. To further reduce morbidity and simplify postoperative care, outpatient robotic pyeloplasty (RP) and robotic ureteroureterostomy (RUU) were performed without ureteral stents, drains, or urethral catheters. The aim of the study was to assess the safety of performing tubeless robotic UUTR as an outpatient procedure. A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent outpatient tubeless RP and RUU between July 2015 and January 2017. All procedures were primary interventions. No ureteral stents, drains, or urethral catheters were utilized. No regional blocks were utilized. Patients were discharged from the post anesthesia care unit as a scheduled outpatient procedure without an extended stay. Primary outcomes included 30-day complications, emergency room (ER) visits, and readmissions. A total of 19 patients (14 male, 5 female) were identified (RP = 17, RUU = 3), including one patient who underwent staged bilateral RP. Median age was 21.5 months (range 3-220). Median weight was 11.5 kg (range 6-89). Median operative time was 167 min (range 108-249), defined as skin incision to closure. No 30-day complications, ER visits, or readmissions were observed for any patient. The study concludes that pediatric tubeless outpatient robotic UUTR is safe. Further evaluation is needed to assess this approach on a larger scale, as well as assessing the long-term outcomes of tubeless reconstruction.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleOperative TimePlastic Surgery ProceduresRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary TractUrologic DiseasesAmbulatory surgical proceduresPediatricsSurgical procedures, roboticUreteral obstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.