Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28639007›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2018

Is electroconvulsive therapy an evidence-based treatment for catatonia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arnaud Leroy, Florian Naudet, Guillaume Vaiva, Andrew Francis, Pierre Thomas, Ali Amad

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Structure and neural mechanisms of catatonia.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Arnaud LeroyCNRS UMR 9193-PsyCHIC-SCALab, & CHU Lille, Department of Psychiatry, Univ. Lille, F-59000, Lille, France. arnaud.g.leroy@wanadoo.fr.
Florian NaudetINSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1414, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Guillaume VaivaCNRS UMR 9193-PsyCHIC-SCALab, & CHU Lille, Department of Psychiatry, Univ. Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Andrew FrancisDepartment of Psychiatry, Penn State Medical School, Hershey, PA, USA.
Pierre ThomasCNRS UMR 9193-PsyCHIC-SCALab, & CHU Lille, Department of Psychiatry, Univ. Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Ali AmadCNRS UMR 9193-PsyCHIC-SCALab, & CHU Lille, Department of Psychiatry, Univ. Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to review and discuss the evidence-based arguments for the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of catatonia. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies focusing on the response to ECT in catatonia were selected in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Current Controlled Trials through October 2016 and qualitatively described. Trials assessing pre-post differences using a catatonia or clinical improvement rating scale were pooled together using a random effect model. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects of anesthesia and seizure. 564 patients from 28 studies were included. RCTs were of low quality and were heterogeneous; therefore, it was not possible to combine their efficacy results. An improvement of catatonic symptoms after ECT treatment was evidenced in ten studies (SMD = -3.14, 95% CI [-3.95; -2.34]). The adverse effects that were reported in seven studies included mental confusion, memory loss, headache, or adverse effects associated with anesthesia. ECT protocols were heterogeneous. The literature consistently describes improvement in catatonic symptoms after ECT. However, the published studies fail to demonstrate efficacy and effectiveness. It is now crucial to design and perform a quality RCT to robustly validate the use of ECT in catatonia.Prospero registration information: PROSPERO 2016: CRD42016041660.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineOutcome Assessment, Health CareCatatoniaHumansCatatoniaElectroconvulsive therapyEvidence-based medicineRCT

Identifiers

PMID28639007
OpenAlexW2676111886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.