ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017
[Psychotraumatology : Differentiation, extension and public discourse].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Diagnostics of posttraumatic stress disorder according to DSM-5 and ICD-11].Der Nervenarzt · 2019Article
- [Quality of life and posttraumatic stress disorder after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first description of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the 1980s marked the origin of psychotraumatology. Based on the variety of developments in the meantime and being relevant for basic research and clinical application, a differentiation of diagnoses according to the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) are presented including PTSD, complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder and adjustment disorder. In addition, extension towards traumatic and adverse childhood experiences and their significance for lifetime mental and somatic morbidity are described. Concerning these childhood traumata and adversities, distinct biological and epigenetic factors have been extensively investigated. Also, research groups have postulated that important psychological disorders should be differentiated according to those with and those without reference to pathogenetic trauma. Lastly, regarding relevant public discourses, societal dimensions of victimhood and compensation are discussed as well as a global perspective with respect to continuous and historical traumatization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28638959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.