ArticleBrain and behavior2017
Vowel decoding from single-trial speech-evoked electrophysiological responses: A feature-based machine learning approach.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neural correlates and predictors of speech and language development in infants at elevated likelihood for autism: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Time-efficient Methodology for Robustly Assessing Speech-related Mismatch Responses in Adults and Infants.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using frequency following responses.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Translational Applications of Machine Learning in Auditory Electrophysiology.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Implementation of Machine Learning on Human Frequency-Following Responses: A Tutorial.Seminars in hearing · 2022Review
- Principal component decomposition of acoustic and neural representations of time-varying pitch reveals adaptive efficient coding of speech covariation patterns.Brain and language · 2022Article
- Vowel speech recognition from rat electroencephalography using long short-term memory neural network.PloS one · 2022Article
- Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Development of a Digital Content-Free Speech Analysis Tool for the Measurement of Mental Health and Follow-Up for Mental Disorders: Protocol for a Case-Control Study.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Rhythmic Temporal Expectation Boosts Neural Activity by Increasing Neural Gain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.Nature communications · 2019Review
- Biometric identification of listener identity from frequency following responses to speech.Journal of neural engineering · 2019Article
- Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Review
- Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2017Article
- Vowel decoding from single-trial speech-evoked electrophysiological responses: A feature-based machine learning approach.Brain and behavior · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionScalp-recorded electrophysiological responses to complex, periodic auditory signals reflect phase-locked activity from neural ensembles within the auditory system. These responses, referred to as frequency-following responses (FFRs), have been widely utilized to index typical and atypical representation of speech signals in the auditory system. One of the major limitations in FFR is the low signal-to-noise ratio at the level of single trials. For this reason, the analysis relies on averaging across thousands of trials. The ability to examine the quality of single-trial FFRs will allow investigation of trial-by-trial dynamics of the FFR, which has been impossible due to the averaging approach.
methodsIn a novel, data-driven approach, we used machine learning principles to decode information related to the speech signal from single trial FFRs. FFRs were collected from participants while they listened to two vowels produced by two speakers. Scalp-recorded electrophysiological responses were projected onto a low-dimensional spectral feature space independently derived from the same two vowels produced by 40 speakers, which were not presented to the participants. A novel supervised machine learning classifier was trained to discriminate vowel tokens on a subset of FFRs from each participant, and tested on the remaining subset.
resultsWe demonstrate reliable decoding of speech signals at the level of single-trials by decomposing the raw FFR based on information-bearing spectral features in the speech signal that were independently derived.
conclusionsTaken together, the ability to extract interpretable features at the level of single-trials in a data-driven manner offers unchartered possibilities in the noninvasive assessment of human auditory function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.