Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28638700›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2017

Vowel decoding from single-trial speech-evoked electrophysiological responses: A feature-based machine learning approach.

Han G Yi, Zilong Xie, Rachel Reetzke, Alexandros G Dimakis, Bharath Chandrasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rhythmic Temporal Expectation Boosts Neural Activity by Increasing Neural Gain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Han G YiDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders Moody College of Communication The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-3712
Zilong XieDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders Moody College of Communication The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA.
Rachel ReetzkeDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders Moody College of Communication The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA.
Alexandros G DimakisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cockrell School of Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA.
Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders Moody College of Communication The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA.

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScalp-recorded electrophysiological responses to complex, periodic auditory signals reflect phase-locked activity from neural ensembles within the auditory system. These responses, referred to as frequency-following responses (FFRs), have been widely utilized to index typical and atypical representation of speech signals in the auditory system. One of the major limitations in FFR is the low signal-to-noise ratio at the level of single trials. For this reason, the analysis relies on averaging across thousands of trials. The ability to examine the quality of single-trial FFRs will allow investigation of trial-by-trial dynamics of the FFR, which has been impossible due to the averaging approach.

methodsIn a novel, data-driven approach, we used machine learning principles to decode information related to the speech signal from single trial FFRs. FFRs were collected from participants while they listened to two vowels produced by two speakers. Scalp-recorded electrophysiological responses were projected onto a low-dimensional spectral feature space independently derived from the same two vowels produced by 40 speakers, which were not presented to the participants. A novel supervised machine learning classifier was trained to discriminate vowel tokens on a subset of FFRs from each participant, and tested on the remaining subset.

resultsWe demonstrate reliable decoding of speech signals at the level of single-trials by decomposing the raw FFR based on information-bearing spectral features in the speech signal that were independently derived.

conclusionsTaken together, the ability to extract interpretable features at the level of single-trials in a data-driven manner offers unchartered possibilities in the noninvasive assessment of human auditory function.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, PhysiologicalSpeech PerceptionEEGfrequency‐following responsesspeech decodingvowels

Identifiers

PMID28638700
PMCPMC5474698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.