Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28638252›Full record

ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2017

Evaluation of the Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Urocortin Expression in Women with Ovarian Endometriomas.

Serenat Eris Yalcin, Irfan Ocal, Yakup Yalcin, Halime Sen Selim, Melike Demir Caltekin, Huseyin Aydogmus, Sefa Kelekci

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serenat Eris YalcinDepartment of Perinatology, Süleyman Demirel University School of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.
Irfan OcalDepartment of Pathology, İzmir Katip Çelebi Univesity School of Medicine, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Yakup YalcinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Süleyman Demirel University School of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.
Halime Sen SelimDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Seferihisar Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Melike Demir CaltekinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Malatya Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
Huseyin AydogmusDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, İzmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir Turkey.
Sefa KelekciDepartment of Perinatology, İzmir Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.
Süleyman Demirel University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe reasons why endometriosis is more aggressive and invasive in some patients are unknown. Despite the importance of population-based clinically defined risk factors in the prediction of recurrence, biochemical markers obtained from the patient are more valuable for prediction on an individual basis. Therefore, the discovery of significant potential biomarkers could be useful to clinicians for shedding light on the pathogenesis of endometriosis and in the monitoring recurrence. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study included 50 patients who underwent surgery for ovarian cysts that were diagnosed as endometrioma. The age of the patients, stage of the endometriosis, diameter and localization of endometriomas, type of surgery, and pre- and postoperative cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The archived pathology slides were stained with Ki-67 and anti-urocortin antibodies for reevaluation. By comparing the pathology parameters of the patients with and without recurrence, the association between these parameters and recurrence was investigated.

resultsThe median Ki-67 proliferation index of the patients with recurrence (7.5±6.5) was statistically significant compared with that of the patients without recurrence (1±4) (p=0.003). The urocortin epithelial staining intensity and percentage were not found to be statistically significant in comparison. A statistically significant difference was determined between postoperative CA125 median levels of patients without recurrence (10±17.6) and those of patients with recurrence (29.9±18.1) (p=0.003).

conclusionThe Ki-67 proliferation index may be useful for predicting prognosis and recurrence risk.

Indexed as

EndometriosisKi-67 proliferation indexurocortin

Identifiers

PMID28638252
PMCPMC5469835
OpenAlexW2624061952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.