Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28638244›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2017

Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Practical Guide to Enhance Patient Outcomes Through Continuity of Care.

Catherine Giuliano, Belinda J Parmenter, Michael K Baker, Braden L Mitchell, Andrew D Williams, Katie Lyndon, Tarryn Mair, Andrew Maiorana, Neil A Smart, Itamar Levinger

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Continuity of Nursing Care in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Evaluation of Telephone-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Services Delivered to Adults 65 and Older During the Early Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine GiulianoInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Belinda J ParmenterDepartment of Exercise Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael K BakerAustralian Catholic University School of Exercise Science, Strathfield, NSW Australia.
Braden L MitchellAlliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andrew D WilliamsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia.
Katie LyndonExercise & Sports Science Australia, Albion, QLD, Australia.
Tarryn MairDivision of Medicine, Exercise Physiology Department, ACT Health, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Andrew MaioranaSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise, Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Neil A SmartSchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Itamar LevingerInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide. Referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class I recommendation for all patients with CAD based on findings that participation can reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, as well as improve functional capacity and quality of life. However, programme uptake remains low, systematic progression through the traditional CR phases is often lacking, and communication between health care providers is frequently suboptimal, resulting in fragmented care. Only 30% to 50% of eligible patients are typically referred to outpatient CR and fewer still complete the programme. In contemporary models of CR, patients are no longer treated by a single practitioner, but rather by an array of health professionals, across multiples specialities and health care settings. The risk of fragmented care in CR may be great, and a concerted approach is required to achieve continuity and optimise patient outcomes. 'Continuity of care' has been described as the delivery of services in a coherent, logical, and timely fashion and which entails 3 specific domains: informational, management, and relational continuity. This is examined in the context of CR.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationContinuity of carecoronary artery diseasemodels of care

Identifiers

PMID28638244
PMCPMC5470863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.