Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28638171›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2017

3D Printed Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Phantom for Image Guided Surgical Planning with a Patient Specific Fenestrated Endovascular Graft System.

Karen M Meess, Richard L Izzo, Maciej L Dryjski, Richard E Curl, Linda M Harris, Michael Springer, Adnan H Siddiqui, Stephen Rudin, Ciprian N Ionita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Engineering functional and anthropomorphic models for surgical training in interventional radiology: A state-of-the-art review.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Advanced 3D Visualization and 3D Printing in Radiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A patient-specific multi-modality abdominal aortic aneurysm imaging phantom.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of challenges and limitations of mechanical thrombectomy using 3D printed neurovascular phantoms.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karen M MeessThe Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Richard L IzzoThe Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Maciej L DryjskiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Richard E CurlDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Linda M HarrisDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Michael SpringerThe Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Adnan H SiddiquiThe Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, NY 14203.
Stephen RudinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14228.
Ciprian N IonitaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14228.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USToshiba (United States) · USCalspan-University of Buffalo Research Center · USJacobs Institute · US

Funding

Micro-Radiographic Imager for Neuroovascular InterventionsR01EB002873 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI RUDIN, STEPHEN · 2003 to 2015
$5.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following new trends in precision medicine, Juxatarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (JAAA) treatment has been enabled by using patient-specific fenestrated endovascular grafts. The X-ray guided procedure requires precise orientation of multiple modular endografts within the arteries confirmed via radiopaque markers. Patient-specific 3D printed phantoms could familiarize physicians with complex procedures and new devices in a risk-free simulation environment to avoid periprocedural complications and improve training. Using the Vascular Modeling Toolkit (VMTK), 3D Data from a CTA imaging of a patient scheduled for Fenestrated EndoVascular Aortic Repair (FEVAR) was segmented to isolate the aortic lumen, thrombus, and calcifications. A stereolithographic mesh (STL) was generated and then modified in Autodesk MeshMixer for fabrication via a Stratasys Eden 260 printer in a flexible photopolymer to simulate arterial compliance. Fluoroscopic guided simulation of the patient-specific FEVAR procedure was performed by interventionists using all demonstration endografts and accessory devices. Analysis compared treatment strategy between the planned procedure, the simulation procedure, and the patient procedure using a derived scoring scheme.

resultsWith training on the patient-specific 3D printed AAA phantom, the clinical team optimized their procedural strategy. Anatomical landmarks and all devices were visible under x-ray during the simulation mimicking the clinical environment. The actual patient procedure went without complications.

conclusionsWith advances in 3D printing, fabrication of patient specific AAA phantoms is possible. Simulation with 3D printed phantoms shows potential to inform clinical interventional procedures in addition to CTA diagnostic imaging.

Indexed as

3D PrintingAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)Fenestrated EndoVascular Aortic Repair (FEVAR)Image Guided InterventionImage Guided ProcedureImage SegmentationSurgical Planning

Identifiers

PMID28638171
PMCPMC5476205
OpenAlexW2595992935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.