Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28637811›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Bayesian Networks Illustrate Genomic and Residual Trait Connections in Maize (

Katrin Töpner, Guilherme J M Rosa, Daniel Gianola, Chris-Carolin Schön

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bayesian network analysis of plasma microRNA sequencing data in patients with venous thrombosis.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katrin TöpnerPlant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Guilherme J M RosaInstitute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Daniel GianolaInstitute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Chris-Carolin SchönPlant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany chris.schoen@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relationships among traits were investigated on the genomic and residual levels using novel methodology. This included inference on these relationships via Bayesian networks and an assessment of the networks with structural equation models. The methodology employed three steps. First, a Bayesian multiple-trait Gaussian model was fitted to the data to decompose phenotypic values into their genomic and residual components. Second, genomic and residual network structures among traits were learned from estimates of these two components. Network learning was performed using six different algorithmic settings for comparison, of which two were score-based and four were constraint-based approaches. Third, structural equation model analyses ranked the networks in terms of goodness of fit and predictive ability, and compared them with the standard multiple-trait fully recursive network. The methodology was applied to experimental data representing the European heterotic maize pools Dent and Flint (

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsQuantitative Trait, HeritableAlgorithmsBayes TheoremPhenotypeZea maysBayesian networkindirect selectionmultiple-trait genome-enabled predictionmultivariate mixed modelstructural equation model

Identifiers

PMID28637811
PMCPMC5555481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.