Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28637644›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Does attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic improve clinical outcomes in women with class III obesity compared with standard care? A retrospective case-note analysis.

Fiona C Denison, Heather MacGregor, Laura I Stirrat, Kerrie Stevenson, Jane E Norman, Rebecca M Reynolds

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnant women with class III obesity: a prospective cohort study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona C DenisonTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-2014
Heather MacGregorTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Laura I StirratTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kerrie StevensonTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jane E NormanTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rebecca M ReynoldsTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether attendance at a specialised multidisciplinary antenatal clinic for women with class III obesity (BMI >40 kg/m

designRetrospective cohort study using routinely collected data from electronic patient record.

settingCommunity and hospital based antenatal care.

participantsWomen with a singleton pregnancy with class III obesity booked for antenatal care and delivered in one of two hospitals in NHS Lothian, Scotland, UK between 2008 and 2014. Maternal and offspring outcomes were compared in women who attended a specialised obesity clinic (n=511) compared with standard antenatal care (n=502).

main outcome measuresIncluded stillbirth, low birth weight, gestational diabetes, induction of labour and caesarean section.

resultsCompared with standard care, women receiving specialist care were less likely to have a stillbirth (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.97) and a low birthweight baby (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99) and more likely to be screened for (100% vs 73.6%; p<0.001) and diagnosed with (26.0% vs 12.5%; p<0.001) gestational diabetes, to require induction of labour (38.4% vs 29.9%; p=0.009), an elective (20.3% vs 17.7%; p<0.001) and emergency (23.9% vs 20.3%; p<0.001) caesarean section and attend antenatal triage one or more times during pregnancy (77.7% vs 53.1%; p<0.001). Women attending the specialist clinic had a higher BMI (44.5 kg/m

conclusionsAttendance at a specialised antenatal clinic for obesity is associated with reduced rates of stillbirth and low birth weight and improved detection of gestational diabetes. The improvement in clinical outcomes is associated with an increase in healthcare attendance to obstetric triage and clinical interventions including induction of labour and caesarean section.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionDiabetes, GestationalElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaternal HealthObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareRetrospective StudiesScotlandlowbirth weightObesitystillbirth

Identifiers

PMID28637644
PMCPMC5730005
OpenAlexW2655751206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.