Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28637508›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2017

Hyperpolarized

Maximilian Fuetterer, Julia Busch, Sophie M Peereboom, Constantin von Deuster, Lukas Wissmann, Miriam Lipiski, Thea Fleischmann, Nikola Cesarovic, Christian T Stoeck, Sebastian Kozerke

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Over four minutes of pyruvate TNature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Three-dimensional high-resolution TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
  13. Relayed hyperpolarization fromChemical science · 2019
    Article
  14. HyperpolarizedRadiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Review
  16. Quantitative myocardial first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging using hyperpolarized [1-Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maximilian FuettererInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia BuschInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sophie M PeereboomInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Constantin von DeusterInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lukas WissmannInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Miriam LipiskiDivision of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thea FleischmannDivision of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nikola CesarovicDivision of Surgical Research, University Hospital Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 14, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian T StoeckInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sebastian KozerkeInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland. kozerke@biomed.ee.ethz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA velocity-selective binomial excitation scheme for myocardial first-pass perfusion measurements with hyperpolarized

methodsThe proposed excitation with an echo-planar imaging readout was implemented on a clinical CMR system. Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion images were acquired in six healthy pigs after bolus injection of hyperpolarized

resultsVelocity-selective excitation provides over three-fold reduction in blood pool signal with a two-fold increase in myocardial CNR. Extracted first-pass perfusion curves reveal a significantly reduced variability of semi-quantitative first-pass perfusion measures (12-20%) for velocity-selective excitation compared to conventional excitation (28-93%), comparable to that of reference

conclusionThe feasibility of hyperpolarized

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityCarbon IsotopesContrast MediaDisease Models, AnimalFeasibility StudiesFemaleMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPhantoms, ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSus scrofaUreaCarbon IsotopesContrast MediaUrea13C ureaDynamic imagingFirst-pass perfusionHyperpolarizationMyocardial perfusion

Identifiers

PMID28637508
PMCPMC5480203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.