Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28637485›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

The development of lower respiratory tract microbiome in mice.

Nisha Singh, Asheema Vats, Aditi Sharma, Amit Arora, Ashwani Kumar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What Makes the Gut-Lung Axis Working? From the Perspective of Microbiota and Traditional Chinese Medicine.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nisha SinghCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39 A, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Asheema VatsCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39 A, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Aditi SharmaCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39 A, Chandigarh, 160036, India.
Amit AroraCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39 A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. amit_arora@imtech.res.in.
Ashwani KumarCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39 A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. ashwanik@imtech.res.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6240-6810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough culture-independent methods have paved the way for characterization of the lung microbiome, the dynamic changes in the lung microbiome from neonatal stage to adult age have not been investigated.

resultsIn this study, we tracked changes in composition and diversity of the lung microbiome in C57BL/6N mice, starting from 1-week-old neonates to 8-week-old mice. Towards this, the lungs were sterilely excised from mice of different ages from 1 to 8 weeks. High-throughput DNA sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene followed by composition and diversity analysis was utilized to decipher the microbiome in these samples. Microbiome analysis suggests that the changes in the lung microbiome correlated with age. The lung microbiome was primarily dominated by phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria in all the stages from week 1 to week 8 after birth. Although Defluvibacter was the predominant genus in 1-week-old neonatal mice, Streptococcus became the dominant genus at the age of 2 weeks. Lactobacillus, Defluvibacter, Streptococcus, and Achromobacter were the dominant genera in 3-week-old mice, while Lactobacillus and Achromobacter were the most abundant genera in 4-week-old mice. Interestingly, relatively greater diversity (at the genus level) during the age of 5 to 6 weeks was observed as compared to the earlier weeks. The diversity of the lung microbiome remained stable between 6 and 8 weeks of age.

conclusionsIn summary, we have tracked the development of the lung microbiome in mice from an early age of 1 week to adulthood. The lung microbiome is dominated by the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. However, dynamic changes were observed at the genus level. Relatively higher richness in the microbial diversity was achieved by age of 6 weeks and then maintained at later ages. We believe that this study improves our understanding of the development of the mice lung microbiome and will facilitate further analyses of the role of the lung microbiome in chronic lung diseases.

Indexed as

AgingMetagenomeAchromobacterActinobacteriaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBacillotaBacteroidetesGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLactobacillusLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobiotaProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SLung microbiomeMice microbiomeRespiratory microbiomeTime series

Identifiers

PMID28637485
PMCPMC5479047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.