ArticleBMC public health2017
A qualitative analysis of smokers' perceptions about lung cancer screening.
Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening uptake and intention to screen: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Pooled it
- Facilitators and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening during Long COVID: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Study Synthesis of Qualitative Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Patient and Healthcare Provider Barriers in the LDCT Lung Cancer Screening Continuum.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Using AI to Design and Develop Online Educational Modules to Enhance Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among High-Risk Individuals.Cancers · 2026Article
- Understanding Patient Perspectives on Digital Smoking History Data Collection.CHEST pulmonary · 2025Article
- Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Racism, discrimination, medical mistrust, stigma, and lung cancer screening: a scoping review.Ethnicity & health · 2025Article
- Multimodal Framework in Lung Cancer Management: Integrating Liquid Biopsy with Traditional Diagnostic Techniques.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
- Knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer screening among Black individuals at high risk: a qualitative approach.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Tobacco quitline staffs' knowledge and attitudes about connecting quitline callers to lung cancer screening educational materials.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland: Focus group participant perspectives in the LUNGSCOT study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Health beliefs toward lung cancer screening among Chinese American high-risk smokers: Interviews based on Health Belief Model.International journal of nursing sciences · 2022Article
- Motivation is not enough: A qualitative study of lung cancer screening uptake in Australia to inform future implementation.PloS one · 2022Article
- Cross-Cultural Modification Strategies for Instruments Measuring Health Beliefs About Cancer Screening: Systematic Review.JMIR cancer · 2021Review
- Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Healthcare Access, Utilization, and Preventive Health Behaviors by Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Perceptions of lung cancer screening and smoking behavior change among Chinese immigrants: A systematic review.Tobacco induced diseases · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the Informational Content and Readability of US Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Article
- Barriers to and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening Among Latino and Non-Latino Current and Former Smokers.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2013, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) began recommending lung cancer screening for high risk smokers aged 55-80 years using low-dose computed tomography (CT) scan. In light of these updated recommendations, there is a need to understand smokers' knowledge of and experiences with lung cancer screening in order to inform the design of patient education and tobacco cessation programs. The purpose of this study is to describe results of a qualitative study examining smokers' perceptions around lung cancer screening tests.
methodsIn 2009, prior to the release of the updated USPSTF recommendations, we conducted 12 120-min, gender-specific focus groups with 105 current smokers in Charlotte, North Carolina and Cincinnati, Ohio. Focus group facilitators asked participants about their experience with three lung cancer screening tests, including CT scan, chest x-ray, and sputum cytology. Focus group transcripts were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using constant comparative methods.
resultsParticipants were 41-67 years-old, with a mean smoking history of 38.9 pack-years. Overall, 34.3% would meet the USPSTF's current eligibility criteria for screening. Most participants were unaware of all three lung cancer screening tests. The few participants who had been screened recalled limited information about the test. Nevertheless, many participants expressed a strong desire to pursue lung cancer screening. Using the social ecological model for health promotion, we identified potential barriers to lung cancer screening at the 1) health care system level (cost of procedure, confusion around results), 2) cultural level (fatalistic beliefs, distrust of medical system), and 3) individual level (lack of knowledge, denial of risk, concerns about the procedure). Although this study was conducted prior to the updated USPSTF recommendations, these findings provide a baseline for future studies examining smokers' perceptions of lung cancer screening.
conclusionWe recommend clear and patient-friendly educational tools to improve patient understanding of screening risks and benefits and the use of best practices to help smokers quit. Further qualitative studies are needed to assess changes in smokers' perceptions as lung cancer screening with CT scan becomes more widely used in community practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.