ReviewJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2017
The Emerging Role of Pimavanserin in the Management of Parkinson's Disease Psychosis.
Review in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review on Parkinson's Disease Medications, Emphasizing on Three Recently Approved Drugs to Control Parkinson's Symptoms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Atypical antipsychotics for Parkinson's disease psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A panel of experts drawn from neurology, psychiatry, geropsychiatry, geriatrics, and pharmacy representatives of 3 health plans convened in New York City on July 30, 2016, with the objective of sharing opinions, ideas, and information regarding the optimal management of Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). Three key points emerged from the discussion: (1) Because of the nature of Parkinson's disease and PDP, finding appropriate treatment can prove challenging; (2) emerging therapies may present an opportunity for effective disease management; and (3) moving forward, provider and patient education regarding PDP and available treatment options is essential for well-managed symptoms and better quality of life. The panel reviewed current practices and formulated recommendations on moving forward in the treatment of PDP. DISCLOSURES: This project and manuscript was funded by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals and developed by Magellan Rx Management. Lopes and Farnum are employees of Magellan Rx Management. Kremens has received consulting/speaker fees from Teva Pharmaceuticals, UCB, Sunovion, Impax, Lundbeck, ACADIA, USWorldMeds, Merz, Acorda, Kyowa, Neurocrine, and GE Healthcare. Pagan reports consulting/speaker fees from Teva Nanoscience, AbbVie, Impax, ACADIA, Medtronic, USWorldMeds, Merz, and Cynapsus and research and educational grants from USWorldMeds, Teva, and Medtronic. Patel has received consultant/speaker fees from ACADIA, Allergen, and Avanir. Alva reports research support from Accera, Allergan, Axovant, Eisai, Neurotrope, Genentech, Intra Cellular, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurim, Novartis, Otsuka, Roche, Suven, and Trans Tech and consultant/speaker fees from ACADIA, Alkermes, Allergan, Avanir, Janssen, Lundbeck, Merck, Nestle, Otsuka, Sunovion, Takeda, and Vanda. The other authors report no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.