Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28635973›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2017

Deconstructing Decisions to Initiate, Maintain, or Discontinue Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Shirley M Bluethmann, Caitlin C Murphy, Jasmin A Tiro, Michelle A Mollica, Sally W Vernon, Leona Kay Bartholomew

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Adherence to Oral Hormonal Treatment among Breast Cancer Patients in Egypt.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shirley M BluethmannPenn State University.
Caitlin C MurphyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Jasmin A TiroUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Michelle A MollicaNational Cancer Institute.
Sally W VernonUniversity of Texas Health Science Center.
Leona Kay BartholomewUniversity of Texas Health Science Center.
Southwestern Medical CenterThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USNational Institutes of Health · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesAdjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) has been shown to improve survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer survivors, but as many as half do not complete recommended treatment. Management of medication-related side effects and engagement with providers are two potentially modifiable factors, but their associations with adherence are not well understood. The aims were to build on survey results to qualitatively explore survivors' experiences with prescribed AET to (a) describe appraisal and management of AET side effects and (b) deconstruct decisions to initiate, discontinue, or maintain AET.
. RESEARCH APPROACH: The authors used a mixed-methods explanatory sequence research design with a qualitative emphasis.
.

settingSurvivors were recruited from a clinical cancer registry maintained at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, which includes the Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (National Cancer Institute-designated), in Dallas.
.

participants452 survivors completed a survey, and 30 took part in telephone interviews.
. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Qualitative methods were used in which the authors recorded and transcribed interviews for analysis and used open coding to reduce data into themes.
.

findingsAmong adherent survivors, the themes of tolerance of side effects and perseverance were strong. Nonadherent survivors expressed more difficulty managing side effects and perceived fewer benefits when side effects were bothersome. The most common side effects mentioned by all survivors were menopausal symptoms and joint pain; less common side effects were cognitive decline and cardiac distress. Some sought advice from their oncology team. Nonadherent survivors appeared initially motivated to maintain AET but identified a tolerance limit for side effects after which a provider's recommendation was less influential in their decision to maintain or discontinue AET.
.

interpretationThis study elucidated adherence as a complex continuum of behaviors, appraisals, and decision points. These insights may be particularly useful in counseling survivors taking AET and promoting timely delivery of clinical interventions to enhance adherence.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses should be involved in the planning and implementation of clinical interventions to manage side effects and other barriers to AET adherence.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantDrug MonitoringAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsFemaleFocus GroupsHormonesHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAntineoplastic AgentsHormonesadjuvant endocrine therapybreast cancer survivorsside effectssurvivorship caresymptoms

Identifiers

PMID28635973
PMCPMC5507080
OpenAlexW2613379367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.