Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28635967›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

Social behaviour involving drug resistance: the role of initial density, initial frequency and population structure in shaping the effect of antibiotic resistance as a public good.

I L Domingues, J A Gama, L M Carvalho, F Dionisio

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How social is social resistance?Essays in biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I L DominguesDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências, CE3C-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
J A GamaDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências, CE3C-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
L M CarvalhoDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências, CE3C-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
F DionisioDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências, CE3C-Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria sometimes cooperate with co-inhabiting cells. Pathogenic bacteria, for example, often produce and excrete virulence factors, eventually benefitting both producer and non-producer cells. The role of social interactions involving antibiotic resistance, however, has been more elusive. Enzymes that inactivate β-lactam antibiotics such as ampicillin or penicillin (β-lactamases) are good candidates as public goods. Nonetheless, it has been claimed that bacteria harbouring plasmids of natural origin coding for β-lactamase almost do not protect sensitive bacteria. This does not fit with the fact that ampicillin-sensitive bacteria can be isolated from subjects undergoing ampicillin treatment. We hypothesised that there are two non-exclusive explanations for the discrepancy between previous works: (1) the range of values of demographic conditions (such as initial strain frequency, initial total cell density or habitat structure) has not been broad enough to include most scenarios, or (2) there are interactions between some of these factors. We performed experiments with Escherichia coli bacterial cells to measure the degree of protection of sensitive cells when co-cultured with cells harbouring RP4, R16a or the R1 plasmids, all of natural origin and coding for β-lactamases, and in presence of ampicillin. In these co-cultures, performed in structured and non-structured environments, both the initial total cell density and the initial frequency of sensitive cells spanned four orders of magnitude. We found protection of sensitive cells in 63% of tested conditions. All factors (plasmid, structure, frequency and density) significantly affect levels of protection. Moreover, all factors interact, with interactions revealing large or very large effect sizes.

Indexed as

Ampicillinbeta-LactamasesCoculture TechniquesDrug Resistance, MicrobialEscherichia coliGenetic FitnessPlasmidsPopulation DensityAmpicillinbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID28635967
PMCPMC5637362
OpenAlexW2676659422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.