Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28635055›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2017

Melanoma complicating treatment with natalizumab for multiple sclerosis: A report from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR).

Rachel A Sabol, Virginia Noxon, Oliver Sartor, Joseph R Berger, Zaina Qureshi, Dennis W Raisch, LeAnn B Norris, Paul R Yarnold, Peter Georgantopoulos, William J Hrushesky and 5 more

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Melanoma Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Integrins as therapeutic targets in the organ-specific metastasis of human malignant melanoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rachel A SabolTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Virginia NoxonThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Oliver SartorTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Joseph R BergerDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Zaina QureshiThe Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Dennis W RaischUniversity of New Mexico, College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
LeAnn B NorrisThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Paul R YarnoldThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Peter GeorgantopoulosThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
William J HrusheskyThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Laura BoboltsOncology Analytics, Plantation, Florida.
Paul RayThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Akida LebbyThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Robert C KaneThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.
Charles L BennettThe Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-5705

Funding

Southern Oncology Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR) - Focus on Tyrosine KinaseR01CA165609 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BENNETT, CHARLES L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 43-year-old female with multiple sclerosis developed urethral melanoma. The only potential risk factor was treatment with natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against α4 integrins. To investigate the risk-exposure relationship, we reviewed this case, all other published cases, and cases of natalizumab-associated melanoma reported to regulatory agencies. Data sources included the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (2004-2014), a FDA Advisory Committee Meeting Report, and peer-reviewed publications. In the United States, the manufacturer maintains an FDA-mandated Tysabri Safety Surveillance Program (part of the Tysabri Outcomes Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH)) of natalizumab-treated patients. We statistically compared reporting completeness for natalizumab-associated melanoma cases in FAERs for which information was obtained entirely from the TOUCH program versus cases where FAERS information was supplemented by TOUCH program information. FAERS included 137 natalizumab-associated melanoma reports in patients with multiple sclerosis. Median age at melanoma diagnosis was 45 years (range: 21-74 years). Changes in preexisting nevi occurred in 16%, history of cutaneous nevi occurred in 22%, diagnosis within 2 years of beginning natalizumab occurred in 34%, and 74% had primary surgical treatment. Among seven natalizumab-treated MS patients who developed biopsy-confirmed melanoma on treatment and reported in the literature, median age at diagnosis was 41 years (range: 38-48 years); and the melanoma diagnosis occurred following a median of 12 natalizumab doses (range: 1-77 doses). A history of mole or nevi was noted in four patients and a history of prior melanoma was noted in one patient. Completeness scores for reports were significantly lower for FAERS cases reported from the TOUCH program versus FAERS cases supplemented by TOUCH information (median score of 2 vs. 4 items out of 8-possible items, P < 0.0007). Clinicians should monitor existing nevi and maintain suspicion for melanoma developing in natalizumab-treated patients. The TOUCH Safety Surveillance Program, currently focused on progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, should be expanded to include information on other serious complications including malignancies, particularly if they are immunologic in nature.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMelanomaMultiple SclerosisNatalizumabNeoplasms, Second PrimaryImmunologic FactorsNatalizumabMelanomamultiple sclerosisnatalizumab

Identifiers

PMID28635055
PMCPMC5504343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.