ArticleWorld journal of urology2017
Novel insights into a reputably irreversible process: combined mRNA and miRNA profiling of tissue from vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding Horizons: Robotic Surgery in Functional and Reconstructive Urology.International neurourology journal · 2026Article
- A review of management options for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis and the emergence of robotic reconstruction.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Contemporary Outcomes after Transurethral Procedures for Bladder Neck Contracture Following Endoscopic Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Posterior urethral stenosis after prostate cancer treatment: contemporary options for definitive management.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUntil recently, tissue fibrosis-ultimately leading to permanent scaring-has been considered an irreversible process. However, recent findings indicate that it may be reversible after all. Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) as fibrous narrowing is a frequent complication after radical prostatectomy with high recurrence rates and requires invasive treatment. The pathophysiology is poorly understood. Therefore, a combined mRNA and miRNA transcription profiling in tissue from VUAS was performed using nCounter technology.
methodsTo assess tissue morphology and fiber composition, histochemical staining was performed. RNA expression of healthy and fibrotic tissue of twelve patients was analyzed using the human miRNA panel v3 and mRNA PanCancer pathway panel on the nCounter gene1 system and qRT-PCR. Differential expression data analysis was performed using the nSolver software implementing the R-based advanced pathway analysis tool. miRWalk2.0 was used for miRNA target prediction.
resultsMore linearized tissue architecture, increased collagens, and decreased elastic fibers were observed in VUAS samples. 23 miRNAs and 118 protein coding genes were differentially expressed (p < 0.01) in fibrotic tissue. miRNA target prediction and overlap analysis indicated an interaction of the strongest deregulated miRNAs with 29 deregulated mRNAs. Pathway analysis revealed alterations in DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and TGF-beta signaling. qRT-PCR confirmed differential expression of top deregulated miRNAs and mRNAs.
conclusionsIn VUAS tissue, severe alterations on mRNA and miRNA level are found. These consistent changes give insights into the pathogenesis of VUAS after radical prostatectomy and point to future options for transcriptomics-based risk stratification and targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28634911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.