Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634908›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2017

An Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-Based Framework to Prepare Fourth-Year Medical Students for Internal Medicine Careers.

D Michael Elnicki, Meenakshy K Aiyer, Maria L Cannarozzi, Alexander Carbo, Paul R Chelminski, Shobhina G Chheda, Saumil M Chudgar, Heather E Harrell, L Chad Hood, Michelle Horn and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electronic Health Record Skills Workshop for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medical Education Then and Now.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

D Michael ElnickiUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. dme101@pitt.edu.
Meenakshy K AiyerUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Maria L CannarozziUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.
Alexander CarboHarvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Paul R ChelminskiUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Shobhina G ChhedaUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Saumil M ChudgarDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Heather E HarrellUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
L Chad HoodUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.
Michelle HornUniversity of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, MS, USA.
Karnjit JohlUniversity of California-Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Gregory C KaneSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Diana B McNeillDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Marty D MuntzMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Anne G PereiraUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Emily StewartSidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Heather TarantinoCarolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
T Robert VuIndiana University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the fourth year of medical school remains controversial. Competing demands during this transitional phase cause confusion for students and educators. In 2014, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) released 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (CEPAERs). A committee comprising members of the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine and the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine applied these principles to preparing students for internal medicine residencies. The authors propose a curricular framework based on five CEPAERs that were felt to be most relevant to residency preparation, informed by prior stakeholder surveys. The critical areas outlined include entering orders, forming and answering clinical questions, conducting patient care handovers, collaborating interprofessionally, and recognizing patients requiring urgent care and initiating that care. For each CEPAER, the authors offer suggestions about instruction and assessment of competency. The fourth year of medical school can be rewarding for students, while adequately preparing them to begin residency, by addressing important elements defined in the core entrustable activities. Thus prepared, new residents can function safely and competently in supervised postgraduate settings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalCareer MobilityCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyMaleclinical skills assessmentmedical educationmedical education—assessmentmedical education curriculum development/assessmentmedical education—mentoringmedical education—undergraduate

Identifiers

PMID28634908
PMCPMC5653547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.