Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634807›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2018

Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors utilizing ultrasound parameters.

Takeshi Morii, Tomonori Kishino, Naoko Shimamori, Mitsue Motohashi, Hiroaki Ohnishi, Keita Honya, Takayuki Aoyagi, Takashi Tajima, Shoichi Ichimura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imaging of Vascular Anomalies.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic value of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) in evaluation of subcutaneous lesions.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Imaging update on soft tissue sarcoma.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi MoriiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 161-8611, Japan. t-morii@gb3.so-net.ne.jp.
Tomonori KishinoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Naoko ShimamoriDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Mitsue MotohashiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Hiroaki OhnishiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Keita HonyaDepartment of Medical Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyorin University, 5-4-1 Shimorenjaku, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8612, Japan.
Takayuki AoyagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 161-8611, Japan.
Takashi TajimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 161-8611, Japan.
Shoichi IchimuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 161-8611, Japan.
Kyorin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreoperative discrimination between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors is critical for the prevention of excess application of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy as well as unplanned resection. Although ultrasound, including power Doppler imaging, is an easy, noninvasive, and cost-effective modality for screening soft tissue tumors, few studies have investigated reliable discrimination between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

methodsTo establish a modality for discrimination between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors using ultrasound, we extracted the significant risk factors for malignancy based on ultrasound information from 40 malignant and 56 benign pathologically diagnosed soft tissue tumors and established a scoring system based on these risk factors.

resultsThe maximum size, tumor margin, and vascularity evaluated using ultrasound were extracted as significant risk factors. Using the odds ratio from a multivariate regression model, a scoring system was established. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed a high area under the curve value (0.85), confirming the accuracy of the scoring system.

conclusionUltrasound is a useful modality for establishing the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeurilemmomaSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsUltrasonographyYoung AdultDiagnosisSoft tissue tumorUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID28634807
OpenAlexW2643377630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.