Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634679›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Establishment of two forensic medicine OSCE stations on the subject of external post-mortem examination.

S Heide, R Lessig, V Hachmann, D Stiller, M Rönsch, D Stoevesandt, A Biolik, S Watzke, J Kellner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S HeideInstitute for Forensic Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Franzosenweg 1, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. steffen.heide@uk-halle.de.
R LessigInstitute for Forensic Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Franzosenweg 1, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
V HachmannInstitute for Forensic Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Franzosenweg 1, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
D StillerInstitute for Forensic Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Franzosenweg 1, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
M RönschDorothea Erxleben Learning Centre, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
D StoevesandtDorothea Erxleben Learning Centre, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
A BiolikDorothea Erxleben Learning Centre, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
S WatzkeClinic and Polyclinic of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Halle University Hospital, Halle, Germany.
J KellnerDorothea Erxleben Learning Centre, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An improvement in quality of medical external post-mortem examinations among others can be achieved by more intensive training of medical students. Modern learning and teaching methods such as e-learning modules and SkillsLab stations should be used for this. The introduction of corresponding methods of assessment such as the OSCE procedure is necessary to test the success of learning. In Halle (Germany), two OSCE stations on the subject of external post-mortem examinations were introduced in 2016. The 'practical external post-mortem examination' station test skills and abilities students have learned during practical external post-mortem examination in small group classes on a simulation doll. At the 'death certificate' station, an original death certificate must be filled in, testing the knowledge, skills and abilities learned in the SkillsLab station and during e-learning. A total of 148 students took part in the test. At both stations, at least two thirds of the students (69.5 and 81.7%) were able to show good or very good test results. In addition to the strengths, a detailed evaluation of the test results showed that there were still deficits in terms of the corresponding courses (e.g. inspection of the neck region in the small group classes), which will have to be remedied in the future. When analysing the test concept and the test implementation, objectivity was nearly perfect. There was a satisfactory internal consistency and stability over 8 months. Ultimately, in addition to several strengths (such as good understanding and transparency of the checklists) the evaluation of the examiners also showed further potential areas for improvement (e.g. harmonisation of the degree of difficulty for the individual rotations) when designing the OSCE stations. Overall, it was possible to determine that the OSCE testing format is a suitable tool to test external post-mortem examination skills and that conclusions about improvements in teaching can also be drawn from this.

Indexed as

AutopsyDeath CertificatesEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateForensic MedicineGermanyHumansStudents, MedicalExternal post-mortem examinationForensic medicineOSCESkillsLab station

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.