ArticleScience and technology of advanced materials2017
Evaluation of
Article in Science and technology of advanced materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening of Methyl-β-cyclodextrins as an Antifading Agent for Cyanine Dye-Labeled Streptavidin to Improve the Performance of Genotyping Chips.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Protective effect of chitosan-modified rice porous starch loaded catechin on HT-29 cells exposed to lead ion.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Isolation and anticancer activity of quercetin from3 Biotech · 2023Article
- The Combined Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Bioactive Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Loaded with Altretamine.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- A study on green synthesis, characterization of chromium oxide nanoparticles and their enzyme inhibitory potential.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Lipid Cubic Mesophases Combined with Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: A Hybrid Multifunctional Platform with Tunable Magnetic Properties for Nanomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Cell Proliferation to Evaluate Preliminarily the Presence of Enduring Self-Regenerative Antioxidant Activity in Cerium Doped Bioactive Glasses.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Synthesis of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Using Various Methods: Implications for Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Specifications for Innovative, Enabling Biomaterials Based on the Principles of Biocompatibility Mechanisms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- A human whole-blood model to study the activation of innate immunity system triggered by nanoparticles as a demonstrator for toxicity.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2019Review
- Cationic Substitutions in Hydroxyapatite: Current Status of the Derived Biofunctional Effects and Their In Vitro Interrogation Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Biophysical, docking, and cellular studies on the effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles on blood components: in vitro.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerium oxide nanocrystals (CeO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.