ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017
Fertilizing a Patient Engagement Ecosystem to Innovate Healthcare:
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Factors Impacting User Engagement in Reablement: A Qualitative Study of User, Family Member and Practitioners' Views.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Psychological couple-oriented interventions for patients with heart disease and their partners: a scoping review and guidelines for future interventions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Patient Engagement Experiences in Brain Disorders.Patient related outcome measures · 2022Review
- Patients, Families, and Communities COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs.NAM perspectives · 2021Review
- The Combined Effect of Psychological and Relational Aspects on Cardiac Patient Activation.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2020Article
- A Postcard From Italy: Challenges and Psychosocial Resources of Partners Living With and Without a Chronic Disease During COVID-19 Epidemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The Caregiving Health Engagement Scale (CHE-s): development and initial validation of a new questionnaire for measuring family caregiver engagement in healthcare.BMC public health · 2019Article
- How might patient involvement in healthcare quality improvement efforts work-A realist literature review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Review
- Paternalism vs. Autonomy: Are They Alternative Types of Formal Care?Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): monitoring patients' engagement and psychological resilience in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Informational Power and Perceived Collective Benefit Affecting the Users' Preference for a Mobile Technology: Evidences From a Survey Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Spotlight on the Patient Health Engagement model (PHE model): a psychosocial theory to understand people's meaningful engagement in their own health care.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Review
- Article
- Empowerment from patient's and caregiver's perspective in cancer care.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently we observe a gap between theory and practices of patient engagement. If both scholars and health practitioners do agree on the urgency to realize patient engagement, no shared guidelines exist so far to orient clinical practice. Despite a supportive policy context, progress to achieve greater patient engagement is patchy and slow and often concentrated at the level of policy regulation without dialoguing with practitioners from the clinical field as well as patients and families. Though individual clinicians, care teams and health organizations may be interested and deeply committed to engage patients and family members in the medical course, they may lack clarity about how to achieve this goal. This contributes to a wide "system" inertia-really difficult to be overcome-and put at risk any form of innovation in this filed. As a result, patient engagement risk today to be a buzz words, rather than a real guidance for practice. To make the field clearer, we promoted an Italian Consensus Conference on Patient Engagement (ICCPE) in order to set the ground for drafting recommendations for the provision of effective patient engagement interventions. The ICCPE will conclude in June 2017. This document reports on the preliminary phases of this process. In the paper, we advise the importance of "fertilizing a patient engagement ecosystem": an oversimplifying approach to patient engagement promotion appears the result of a common illusion. Patient "disengagement" is a symptom that needs a more holistic and complex approach to solve its underlined causes. Preliminary principles to promote a patient engagement ecosystem are provided in the paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.