Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634300›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Understanding the mechanical response of double-stranded DNA and RNA under constant stretching forces using all-atom molecular dynamics.

Alberto Marin-Gonzalez, J G Vilhena, Ruben Perez, Fernando Moreno-Herrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Engineering tunable catch bonds with DNA.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. On the common pathways of deformation: RNA vs DNA under interrogation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Universality in RNA and DNA deformations induced by salt, temperature change, stretching force, and protein binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Twisting DNA by salt.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alberto Marin-GonzalezDepartment of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
J G VilhenaDepartment of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Ruben PerezDepartamento de Física Teórica de la Materia Condensada, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain; ruben.perez@uam.es fernando.moreno@cnb.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0001-5896-541X
Fernando Moreno-HerreroDepartment of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain; ruben.perez@uam.es fernando.moreno@cnb.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4083-1709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple biological processes involve the stretching of nucleic acids (NAs). Stretching forces induce local changes in the molecule structure, inhibiting or promoting the binding of proteins, which ultimately affects their functionality. Understanding how a force induces changes in the structure of NAs at the atomic level is a challenge. Here, we use all-atom, microsecond-long molecular dynamics to simulate the structure of dsDNA and dsRNA subjected to stretching forces up to 20 pN. We determine all of the elastic constants of dsDNA and dsRNA and provide an explanation for three striking differences in the mechanical response of these two molecules: the threefold softer stretching constant obtained for dsRNA, the opposite twist-stretch coupling, and its nontrivial force dependence. The lower dsRNA stretching resistance is linked to its more open structure, whereas the opposite twist-stretch coupling of both molecules is due to the very different evolution of molecules' interstrand distance with the stretching force. A reduction of this distance leads to overwinding in dsDNA. In contrast, dsRNA is not able to reduce its interstrand distance and can only elongate by unwinding. Interstrand distance is directly correlated with the slide base-pair parameter and its different behavior in dsDNA and dsRNA traced down to changes in the sugar pucker angle of these NAs.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationDNAMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationPlasmidsPressureRNA, Double-StrandedStress, MechanicalTemperatureTorqueDNARNA, Double-StrandedDNAmolecular dynamicsnucleic acid mechanical propertiesRNAtwist-stretch coupling

Identifiers

PMID28634300
PMCPMC5502642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.