Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634289›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Sex-specific early survival drives adult sex ratio bias in snowy plovers and impacts mating system and population growth.

Luke J Eberhart-Phillips, Clemens Küpper, Tom E X Miller, Medardo Cruz-López, Kathryn H Maher, Natalie Dos Remedios, Martin A Stoffel, Joseph I Hoffman, Oliver Krüger, Tamás Székely

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Forecasting range shifts of dioecious plants under climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Luke J Eberhart-PhillipsDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany; luke.eberhart@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7311-6088
Clemens KüpperResearch Group Behavioural Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.
Tom E X MillerDepartment of BioSciences, Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.
Medardo Cruz-LópezCiencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 D.F., Mexico.
Kathryn H MaherMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
Natalie Dos RemediosDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Martin A StoffelDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Joseph I HoffmanDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Oliver KrügerDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Tamás SzékelyMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.
Bielefeld University · DERice University · USSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult sex ratio (ASR) is a central concept in population biology and a key factor in sexual selection, but why do most demographic models ignore sex biases? Vital rates often vary between the sexes and across life history, but their relative contributions to ASR variation remain poorly understood-an essential step to evaluate sex ratio theories in the wild and inform conservation. Here, we combine structured two-sex population models with individual-based mark-recapture data from an intensively monitored polygamous population of snowy plovers. We show that a strongly male-biased ASR (0.63) is primarily driven by sex-specific survival of juveniles rather than adults or dependent offspring. This finding provides empirical support for theories of unbiased sex allocation when sex differences in survival arise after the period of parental investment. Importantly, a conventional model ignoring sex biases significantly overestimated population viability. We suggest that sex-specific population models are essential to understand the population dynamics of sexual organisms: reproduction and population growth are most sensitive to perturbations in survival of the limiting sex. Overall, our study suggests that sex-biased early survival may contribute toward mating system evolution and population persistence, with implications for both sexual selection theory and biodiversity conservation.

Indexed as

ReproductionSex RatioSexual Behavior, AnimalAlgorithmsAnimalsBiodiversityCharadriiformesFemaleHumansMaleMexicoModels, StatisticalPopulation DynamicsPopulation GrowthSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsASRCharadrius nivosusmark–recapturesex allocationtwo-sex matrix model

Identifiers

PMID28634289
PMCPMC5502594
OpenAlexW2680485545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.