Observational studyEuropean journal of endocrinology2017
In-frame seven amino-acid duplication in
Observational study in European journal of endocrinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Genetic Spectrum of Large AIP Deletions.Human mutation · 2026Article
- A founder event causing a dominant childhood epilepsy survives 800 years through weak selective pressure.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Genetics of Acromegaly and Gigantism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- The Pituitary Tumors and Their Tumor-Specific Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Phosphodiesterases and cAMP Pathway in Pituitary Diseases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
- The causes and consequences of pituitary gigantism.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2018Review
- Structural Biology Helps Interpret Variants of Uncertain Significance in Genes Causing Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 16 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein ( DESIGN AND
methodsObservational, inferential and experimental study, including:
resultsNine European-origin, unrelated c.805_825dup-positive pedigrees (four familial, five sporadic from the UK, USA and France) included 16 affected (nine gigantism/four acromegaly/two non-functioning pituitary adenoma patients and one prospectively diagnosed acromegaly patient) and nine unaffected carriers. All pedigrees shared a 2.79 Mbp haploblock around
conclusionsThe c.805_825dup allele, originating from a common ancestor, associates with a severe clinical phenotype and a high frequency of gigantism. The mutation is likely to be the result of slipped strand mispairing and affects protein-protein interactions and AIP protein stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.