Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634237›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

The

Yasuhiko Irie, Aled E L Roberts, Kasper N Kragh, Vernita D Gordon, Jaime Hutchison, Rosalind J Allen, Gavin Melaugh, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Stuart A West, Stephen P Diggle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. TheJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social evolution of shared biofilm matrix components.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Kin selection for cooperation in natural bacterial populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Contribution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in Understanding of the Copper Homeostasis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Yasuhiko IrieSchool of Life Sciences, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom yirie1@udayton.edu stephen.diggle@biosci.gatech.edu.
Aled E L RobertsSchool of Life Sciences, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kasper N KraghDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vernita D GordonCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics and Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Jaime HutchisonCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics and Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Rosalind J AllenSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Gavin MelaughDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas BjarnsholtDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stuart A WestDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stephen P DiggleSchool of Life Sciences, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom yirie1@udayton.edu stephen.diggle@biosci.gatech.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Nottingham · GBRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular polysaccharides are compounds secreted by microorganisms into the surrounding environment, and they are important for surface attachment and maintaining structural integrity within biofilms. The social nature of many extracellular polysaccharides remains unclear, and it has been suggested that they could function as either cooperative public goods or as traits that provide a competitive advantage. Here, we empirically tested the cooperative nature of the PSL polysaccharide, which is crucial for the formation of biofilms in

Indexed as

BiofilmsMicrobial InteractionsPolysaccharides, BacterialPseudomonas aeruginosaPolysaccharides, BacterialbiofilmsPseudomonas aeruginosasocial evolution

Identifiers

PMID28634237
PMCPMC5478892
OpenAlexW2952314782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.