Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634166›Full record

ArticleHospital pediatrics2017

Development and Validation of the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm (PMCA) Version 2.0.

Tamara D Simon, Mary Lawrence Cawthon, Jean Popalisky, Rita Mangione-Smith, Center of Excellence on Quality of Care Measures for Children with Complex Needs (COE4CCN)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New Diagnoses of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of a Large United States Commercial Insurance Database.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2025
    Article
  14. Pediatric Long COVID Subphenotypes: An EHR-based study from the RECOVER program.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamara D SimonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington/Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; tamara.simon@seattlechildrens.org.
Mary Lawrence CawthonResearch and Data Analysis Division, Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, Washington.
Jean PopaliskySeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; and.
Rita Mangione-SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington/Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Center of Excellence on Quality of Care Measures for Children with Complex Needs (COE4CCN)

Funding

Center of Excellence on Quality of Care Measures for Children with Complex NeedsU18HS020506 · AHRQ · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MANGIONE-SMITH, RITA · 2011 to 2014
$7.9M
Multi-center Studies of Pediatric CSF Shunt InfectionsK23NS062900 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SIMON, TAMARA DANIELLE · 2009 to 2013
$893k
AHRQ HHS U18 HS020506NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS062900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm (PMCA) was developed to stratify children by level of medical complexity. We sought to refine PMCA and evaluate its performance based on the duration of eligibility and completeness of Medicaid data.

methodsPMCA version 1.0 was applied to a cohort of 299 children insured by Washington State Medicaid with ≥1 Seattle Children's Hospital outpatient, emergency department, and/or inpatient encounter in 2012. Blinded assessment of the validation cohort's PMCA category was performed by using medical records. In-depth review of discrepant cases was performed and informed the development of PMCA version 2.0. The sensitivity and specificity of PMCA version 2.0 were assessed.

resultsUsing Medicaid data, the sensitivity of PMCA version 2.0 was 74% for complex chronic disease (C-CD), 60% for noncomplex chronic disease (NC-CD), and 87% for those without chronic disease (CD). Specificity was 84% to 91% in Medicaid data for all 3 groups. Medicaid data were most complete for children that had primarily fee-for-service claims and were less complete for those with some managed care encounter data. PMCA version 2.0 performed optimally when children had a longer duration of coverage (25 to 36 months) with fee-for-service reimbursement, identifying children with C-CD with 85% sensitivity and 75% specificity, children with NC-CD with 55% sensitivity and 88% specificity, and children without CD with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity.

conclusionsPMCA version 2.0 identifies children with C-CD with good sensitivity and very good specificity when applied to Medicaid data. Data quality is a critical consideration when using PMCA.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmbulatory CareHospitals, PediatricMedicaidMultiple Chronic ConditionsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInfantMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID28634166
PMCPMC5485351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.