Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634156›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Classifying Chinese Questions Related to Health Care Posted by Consumers Via the Internet.

Haihong Guo, Xu Na, Li Hou, Jiao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. On the Role of Question Summarization and Information Source Restriction in Consumer Health Question Answering.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Qcorp: an annotated classification corpus of Chinese health questions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haihong GuoInstitute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-7998
Xu NaInstitute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-1410
Li HouInstitute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4182-8691
Jiao LiInstitute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6391-8343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn question answering (QA) system development, question classification is crucial for identifying information needs and improving the accuracy of returned answers. Although the questions are domain-specific, they are asked by non-professionals, making the question classification task more challenging.

objectiveThis study aimed to classify health care-related questions posted by the general public (Chinese speakers) on the Internet.

methodsA topic-based classification schema for health-related questions was built by manually annotating randomly selected questions. The Kappa statistic was used to measure the interrater reliability of multiple annotation results. Using the above corpus, we developed a machine-learning method to automatically classify these questions into one of the following six classes: Condition Management, Healthy Lifestyle, Diagnosis, Health Provider Choice, Treatment, and Epidemiology.

resultsThe consumer health question schema was developed with a four-hierarchical-level of specificity, comprising 48 quaternary categories and 35 annotation rules. The 2000 sample questions were coded with 2000 major codes and 607 minor codes. Using natural language processing techniques, we expressed the Chinese questions as a set of lexical, grammatical, and semantic features. Furthermore, the effective features were selected to improve the question classification performance. From the 6-category classification results, we achieved an average precision of 91.41%, recall of 89.62%, and F

conclusionsIn this study, we developed an automatic method to classify questions related to Chinese health care posted by the general public. It enables Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents to understand Internet users' information needs on health care.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAsian PeopleConsumer Health InformationDelivery of Health CareHumansInternetSurveys and Questionnairesclassificationconsumer health informationhypertensionnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID28634156
PMCPMC5497072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.