Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28634084›Full record

ArticlePharmacological research2017

Drug delivery to melanoma brain metastases: Can current challenges lead to new opportunities?

Gautham Gampa, Shruthi Vaidhyanathan, Jann N Sarkaria, William F Elmquist

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacological research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Biological profile of breast cancer brain metastasis.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gautham GampaBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Shruthi VaidhyanathanBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jann N SarkariaRadiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
William F ElmquistBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: elmqu011@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Trans Network ProjectU54CA210180 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WHITE, FOREST M · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Targeting Kif11 to Treat Glioblastoma Invasion and ProliferationR01NS073610 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI CANOLL, PETER, ELMQUIST, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
Influence of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy on Drug Delivery to Brain TumorsR01NS077921 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELMQUIST, WILLIAM, SARKARIA, JANN N. · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210180NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073610NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain, and patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have an extremely poor prognosis. The recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents (e.g., BRAF, MEK inhibitors) and biologics (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies) has brought new hope to patients suffering from this formerly untreatable and lethal disease. Importantly, there have been recent reports of success in some clinical studies examining the efficacy of both targeted agents and immunotherapies that show similar response rates in both brain metastases and extracranial disease. While these studies are encouraging, there remains significant room for improvement in the treatment of MBM, given the lack of durable response and the development of resistance to current therapies. Critical questions remain regarding mechanisms that lead to this lack of durable response and development of resistance, and how those mechanisms may differ in systemic sites versus brain metastases. One issue that may not be fully appreciated is that the delivery of several small molecule molecularly-targeted therapies to the brain is often restricted due to active efflux at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) interface. Inadequate local drug concentrations may be partially responsible for the development of unique patterns of resistance at metastatic sites in the brain. It is clear that there can be local, heterogeneous BBB breakdown in MBM, as exemplified by contrast-enhancement on T1-weighted MR imaging. However, it is possible that the successful treatment of MBM with small molecule targeted therapies will depend, in part, on the ability of these therapies to penetrate an intact BBB and reach the protected micro-metastases (so called "sub-clinical" disease) that escape early detection by contrast-enhanced MRI, as well as regions of tumor within MRI-detectable metastases that may have a less compromised BBB. The emergence of resistance in MBM may be related to several diverse, yet interrelated, factors including the distinct microenvironment of the brain and inadequate brain penetration of targeted therapies to specific regions of tumor. The tumor microenvironment has been ascribed to play a key role in steering the course of disease progression, by dictating changes in expression of tumor drivers and resistance-related signaling mechanisms. Therefore, a key issue to consider is how changes in drug delivery, and hence local drug concentrations within a metastatic microenvironment, will influence the development of resistance. Herein we discuss our perspective on several critical questions that focus on many aspects relevant to the treatment of melanoma brain metastases; the answers to which may lead to important advances in the treatment of this devastating disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsHumansMelanomaAntineoplastic AgentsActive effluxBlood-brain barrierDrug deliveryDrug resistanceMelanoma brain metastasesMolecularly-targeted agents

Identifiers

PMID28634084
PMCPMC5565722
OpenAlexW2662390570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.