ArticleHearing research2017
Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
Article in Hearing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrically evoked compound action potentials in adult and pediatric cochlear implant users: I. Cochlear nerve responsiveness and electrode-neuron interface index.Hearing research · 2026Article
- Validating electrical stimulation through the somatosensory system: a perspective on mismatch negativity and auditory prostheses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Effects of Stimulation Level and Stimulation Rate on Neural Synchrony of the Cochlear Nerve in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.Ear and hearing · 2025Article
- Optimizing electrical stimulation parameters to enhance visual cortex activation in retina degeneration rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models.Hearing research · 2022Review
- Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) have been used to examine temporal response patterns of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. ECAP responses to individual pulses in a pulse train vary across stimulation rates for individual CI users. For very slow rates, auditory neurons have ample time to discharge, recover, and respond to each pulse in the train. As the pulse rate increases, an alternating ECAP-amplitude pattern occurs. As the stimulation rate increases further, the alternating pattern eventually ceases and the overall ECAP amplitudes are diminished, yielding a relatively stochastic state that presumably reflects a combination of adaptation, desynchronization, and facilitation across fibers. Because CIs operate over a range of current levels in everyday use, it is important to understand auditory-nerve responses to pulse trains over a range of levels. The effect of stimulus level on ECAP temporal response patterns in human CI users has not been well studied. The first goal of this study was to examine the effect of stimulus level on various aspects of ECAP temporal responses to pulse-train stimuli. Because higher stimulus levels yield more synchronous responses and faster recovery, it was hypothesized that: (1) the maximum alternation would occur at slower rates for lower levels and faster rates at higher levels, (2) the alternation depth at its maximum would be smaller for lower levels, (3) the rate that produces a stochastic state ('stochastic rate') would decrease with level, (4) adaptation would be greater for lower levels as a result of slower recovery, and (5) refractory-recovery time constants would be longer (slower) for lower levels, consistent with earlier studies. The second goal of this study was to examine how refractory-recovery time constants relate specifically to maximum alternation and stochastic rate. Data were collected for 12 ears in 10 CI recipients. ECAPs were recorded in response to each of 13 pulses in an equal-amplitude pulse train ranging in rate from 900-3500 pps for three levels (low, medium, high). The results generally supported hypotheses 1-4; there were no significant effects of level on the refractory-recovery time constants (hypothesis 5). When data were pooled across level, there was a significant negative correlation between alternation depth and refractory recovery time. Understanding the effects of stimulus level on auditory-nerve responses may provide further insight into improving the use of objective measures for potentially optimizing speech-processing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.