Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28633566›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biomedical engineering2017

Microsphere-Based Scaffolds in Regenerative Engineering.

Vineet Gupta, Yusuf Khan, Cory J Berkland, Cato T Laurencin, Michael S Detamore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vineet GuptaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045; email: vineet.gupta@ku.edu.
Yusuf KhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Campus, Farmington, Connecticut 06030; email: ykhan@uchc.edu , laurencin@uchc.edu.
Cory J BerklandDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045; email: vineet.gupta@ku.edu.
Cato T LaurencinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Campus, Farmington, Connecticut 06030; email: ykhan@uchc.edu , laurencin@uchc.edu.
Michael S DetamoreStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019; email: detamore@ou.edu.

Funding

Regenerative Engineering of Complex Musculoskeletal Tissues and JointsDP1AR068147 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
A Translational Approach Towards Ligament RegenerationR01AR063698 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 2013 to 2018
$1.9M
Gradient-based strategy for osteochondral regenerationR01AR056347 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
Novel Injectable Analgesic Delivery System for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain ManagR21AR066320 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LO, WAI HONG, NAIR, LAKSHMI S · 2014 to 2016
$483k
Engineered Regeneration of Bone through a Small Molecule Cyclic Adenosine MonophoR21AR060480 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 2011 to 2012
$450k
NIAMS NIH HHS DP1 AR068147NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056347NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063698NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR060480NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microspheres have long been used in drug delivery applications because of their controlled release capabilities. They have increasingly served as the fundamental building block for fabricating scaffolds for regenerative engineering because of their ability to provide a porous network, offer high-resolution control over spatial organization, and deliver growth factors/drugs and/or nanophase materials. Because they provide physicochemical gradients via spatiotemporal release of bioactive factors and nanophase ceramics, microspheres are a desirable tool for engineering complex tissues and biological interfaces. In this review we describe various methods for microsphere fabrication and sintering, and elucidate how these methods influence both micro- and macroscopic scaffold properties, with a special focus on the nature of sintering. Furthermore, we review key applications of microsphere-based scaffolds in regenerating various tissues. We hope to inspire researchers to join a growing community of investigators using microspheres as tissue engineering scaffolds so that their full potential in regenerative engineering may be realized.

Indexed as

MicrospheresTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell TransplantationEquipment DesignGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsmicrosphere-based scaffoldsmicrosphere fabricationmicrosphere incorporating scaffoldsmicrospheresmicrosphere sintering

Identifiers

PMID28633566
PMCPMC11610505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.