Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28633533›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2017

In the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention: Is cardiac rehabilitation engagement purely a patient or a service level decision?

Abdulrahman Al Quait, Patrick Doherty, Nils Gutacker, Joseph Mills

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virtual and in-person cardiac rehabilitation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulrahman Al Quait1 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, UK.
Patrick Doherty1 Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, UK.
Nils Gutacker3 Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Science, University of York, UK.
Joseph Mills4 Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK.
University of York · GBKing Fahd Medical City · SAUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation R1680902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims Despite the proven benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), utilization rates remain below recommendation in the percutaneous coronary intervention cohort in most European countries. Although extensive research has been carried out on CR uptake, no previous study has investigated the factors that lead patients to attend the initial CR baseline assessment (CR engagement). This paper attempts to provide new insights into CR engagement in the growing percutaneous coronary intervention population. Methods and results In total, we analysed data on 59,807 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during 2013 to 2016 (mean age 65 years; 25% female). Twenty factors were hypothesized to have a direct impact on CR engagement and they were grouped into four main categories; namely socio-demographic factors, cardiac risk factors, medical status and service-level factors. A binary logistic regression model was constructed to examine the association between CR engagement and tested factors. All but one of the proposed factors had a statistically significant impact on CR engagement. Results showed that CR engagement decreases by 1.2% per year of age (odds ratio 0.98) and is approximately 7% lower (odds ratio 0.93) in female patients, while patients are 4.4 times more likely to engage if they receive a confirmed joining date (odds ratio 4.4). The final model achieved 86.6% sensitivity and 49.0% specificity with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.755. Conclusion The present results highlight the important factors of the likelihood of CR engagement. This implies that future strategies should focus on factors that are associated with CR engagement.

Indexed as

AgedCardiac RehabilitationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMyocardial InfarctionOdds RatioPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateUnited KingdomCardiac rehabilitationobservational studypercutaneous coronary interventionprevention

Identifiers

PMID28633533
PMCPMC5574495
OpenAlexW2648896539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.