Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28633483›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

An informatics research agenda to support patient and family empowerment and engagement in care and recovery during and after hospitalization.

Sarah Collins, Patricia Dykes, David W Bates, Brittany Couture, Ronen Rozenblum, Jennifer Prey, Kristin O'Reilly, Patricia Q Bourie, Cindy Dwyer, S Ryan Greysen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Putting the social back into sociotechnical: Case studies of co-design in digital health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Parental Perceptions of Displayed Patient Data in a PICU: An Example of Unintentional Empowerment.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring the Design of an Inpatient Peer Support Tool: Views of Adult Patients.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sarah CollinsBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patricia DykesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David W BatesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brittany CoutureBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ronen RozenblumBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer PreyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Kristin O'ReillyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Patricia Q BourieBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Cindy DwyerThe Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
S Ryan GreysenDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeffery SmithAmerican Medical Informatics Association.
Michael GropperDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Anuj K DalalBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of an interdisciplinary acute care patient portal task force with members from 10 academic medical centers and professional organizations, we held a national workshop with 71 attendees representing over 30 health systems, professional organizations, and technology companies. Our consensus approach identified 7 key sociotechnical and evaluation research focus areas related to the consumption and capture of information from patients, care partners (eg, family, friends), and clinicians through portals in the acute and post-acute care settings. The 7 research areas were: (1) standards, (2) privacy and security, (3) user-centered design, (4) implementation, (5) data and content, (6) clinical decision support, and (7) measurement. Patient portals are not yet in routine use in the acute and post-acute setting, and research focused on the identified domains should increase the likelihood that they will deliver benefit, especially as there are differences between needs in acute and post-acute care compared to the ambulatory setting.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHospitalizationPatient ParticipationPatient PortalsComputer SecurityDecision Support Systems, ClinicalFamilyHumansInformaticspatient engagementpatient experiencepatient portalsquality of care

Identifiers

PMID28633483
PMCPMC7647133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.