Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28633450›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

Comparative Genomics of All Three Campylobacter sputorum Biovars and a Novel Cattle-Associated C. sputorum Clade.

William G Miller, Emma Yee, Mary H Chapman, James L Bono

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Different Laying Hen Species on Odour Emissions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Complete Genome Sequences of the Campylobacter fetus subsp.Microbiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
  12. Pathogenomics of EmergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William G MillerProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California.
Emma YeeProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California.
Mary H ChapmanProduce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California.
James L BonoMeat Safety and Quality Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, Nebraska.
United States Department of Agriculture · USAgricultural Research Service · USQuality Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter sputorum is a nonthermotolerant campylobacter that is primarily isolated from food animals such as cattle and sheep. C. sputorum is also infrequently associated with human illness. Based on catalase and urease activity, three biovars are currently recognized within C. sputorum: bv. sputorum (catalase negative, urease negative), bv. fecalis (catalase positive, urease negative), and bv. paraureolyticus (catalase negative, urease positive). A multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) method was recently constructed for C. sputorum. MLST typing of several cattle-associated C. sputorum isolates suggested that they are members of a divergent C. sputorum clade. Although catalase positive, and thus technically bv. fecalis, the taxonomic position of these strains could not be determined solely by MLST. To further characterize C. sputorum, the genomes of four strains, representing all three biovars and the divergent clade, were sequenced to completion. Here we present a comparative genomic analysis of the four C. sputorum genomes. This analysis indicates that the three biovars and the cattle-associated strains are highly related at the genome level with similarities in gene content. Furthermore, the four genomes are strongly syntenic with one or two minor inversions. However, substantial differences in gene content were observed among the three biovars. Finally, although the strain representing the cattle-associated isolates was shown to be C. sputorum, it is possible that this strain is a member of a novel C. sputorum subspecies; thus, these cattle-associated strains may form a second taxon within C. sputorum.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCampylobacter sputorumCattleGenome, BacterialGenomicsMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyCampylobacter sputorumcomparative genomicsfecalisparaureolyticussputorum

Identifiers

PMID28633450
PMCPMC5499875
OpenAlexW2646794470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.