ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
The International Society for Computational Biology and WikiProject Computational Biology: celebrating 10 years of collaboration towards open access.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying domain-specific relevance of computational biology Wikipedia articles using TF-IDF and cosine similarity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The 15th ISCB Student Wikipedia Competition: past, present and future perspectives.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- An educator framework for organizing Wikipedia editathons for computational biology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Closing the computational biology 'knowledge gap': Spanish Wikipedia as a case study.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Meeting the challenge of genomic analysis: a collaboratively developed workshop for pangenomics and topological data analysis.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Characterizing domain-specific open educational resources by linking ISCB Communities of Special Interest to Wikipedia.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for designing learning experiences that involve enhancing computational biology Wikipedia articles.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.