Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28632777›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Immunohistochemiocal subtyping using CK20 and CK5 can identify urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract with a poor prognosis.

Danijel Sikic, Bastian Keck, Sven Wach, Helge Taubert, Bernd Wullich, Peter J Goebell, Andreas Kahlmeyer, Peter Olbert, Philipp Isfort, Wilhelm Nimphius and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Danijel SikicDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6588-3022
Bastian KeckDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Sven WachDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Helge TaubertDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Bernd WullichDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Peter J GoebellDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas KahlmeyerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Peter OlbertDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipp IsfortDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Wilhelm NimphiusInstitute of Pathology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Johannes GiedlInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Bridge Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenome-wide analyses revealed basal and luminal subtypes of urothelial carcinomas of the bladder. It is unknown if this subtyping can also be applied to upper tract urothelial carcinomas. MATERIALS AND

methodsTumor samples from 222 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinomas who were treated with radical nephroureterectomy were analyzed for the expression of seven basal/luminal immunohistochemical markers (CK5, EGFR, CD44, CK20, p63, GATA3, FOXA1).

resultsHierarchical clustering revealed a basal-like subtype (enrichment of CK5, EGFR and CD44) in 23.9% and a luminal-like subtype (enrichment of CK20, GATA3, p63 and FOXA1) in 13.1% of the patients. In 60.8%, little to no markers were expressed, whereas markers of both subtypes were expressed in 2.2%. By using CK5 and CK20 as surrogate markers for the basal and luminal subtypes, we defined four subtypes of upper tract urothelial carcinomas: (i) exclusively CK20 positive and CK5 negative (CK20+/CK5-), (ii) exclusively CK5 positive and CK20 negative (CK20-/ CK5+), (iii) both markers positive (CK20+/CK5+) and (iv) both markers negative (CK20-/CK5-). A receiver-operator analysis provided the optimal cut-off values for this discrimination. An immunoreactive score >1 for CK5 and >6 for CK20 were defined as positive. In multivariate Cox's regression analysis, the CK20+/CK5- subtype was an independent negative prognostic marker with a 3.83-fold increased risk of cancer-specific death (p = 0.02) compared to the other three subtypes.

conclusionsImmunohistochemical subgrouping of upper tract urothelial carcinomas by analyzing CK5 and CK20 expression can be performed in a routine setting and can identify tumors with a significantly worse cancer-specific survival prognosis.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratin-20Keratin-5MalePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSurvival RateUrologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-20Keratin-5

Identifiers

PMID28632777
PMCPMC5478149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.