Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28632258›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2017

Materials and microfluidics: enabling the efficient isolation and analysis of circulating tumour cells.

Joshua M Jackson, Małgorzata A Witek, Joyce W Kamande, Steven A Soper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05242237 (The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells Isolated by a Novel Microfluidic Platform in Liver Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05242237 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells Isolated by a Novel Microfluidic Platform in Liver Cancer Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma, Circulating Tumor Cell, Whole Genome Sequencing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua M JacksonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Kansas, USA. ssoper@ku.edu.
Małgorzata A Witek
Joyce W Kamande
Steven A Soper
University of Kansas · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Single-Molecule Processing: Detection and Identification of Single DNAs, RNAs, and Proteins using Immobilized Nanoscale Enzymatic Reactors (INERs) and Nanoscale ElectrophoresisP41EB020594 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Sunggook Park · 2015 to 2026
$15.2M
Acute Myeloid Leukemia: MRD Analysis Using Modular uFluidics and uFlow CytometryR21CA173279 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SOPER, STEVEN ALLAN · 2013 to 2015
$757k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173279NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB020594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a critical review of microfluidic technologies and material effects on the analyses of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) selected from the peripheral blood of cancer patients. CTCs are a minimally invasive source of clinical information that can be used to prognose patient outcome, monitor minimal residual disease, assess tumour resistance to therapeutic agents, and potentially screen individuals for the early diagnosis of cancer. The performance of CTC isolation technologies depends on microfluidic architectures, the underlying principles of isolation, and the choice of materials. We present a critical review of the fundamental principles used in these technologies and discuss their performance. We also give context to how CTC isolation technologies enable downstream analysis of selected CTCs in terms of detecting genetic mutations and gene expression that could be used to gain information that may affect patient outcome.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesCell SeparationHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, Circulating

Identifiers

PMID28632258
PMCPMC5576189
OpenAlexW2673139731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.