Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28632027›Full record

ReviewSmall GTPases2019

Shc and the mechanotransduction of cellular anchorage and metastasis.

Lance S Terada

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small GTPases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lance S Teradaa Department of Internal Medicine , Pulmonary and Critical Care, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

(PQ1) Epigenetic effects of the premalignant fieldR01CA208620 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TERADA, LANCE S · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue cells continually monitor anchorage conditions by gauging the physical properties of their underlying matrix and surrounding environment. The Rho and Ras GTPases are essential components of these mechanosensory pathways. These molecular switches control both cytoskeletal as well as cell fate responses to anchorage conditions and are thus critical to our understanding of how cells respond to their physical environment and, by extension, how malignant cells gainsay these regulatory pathways. Recent studies indicate that 2 proteins produced by the

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMechanotransduction, CellularNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsras ProteinsrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinShc Signaling Adaptor Proteinsras ProteinsrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinShc Signaling Adaptor ProteinsAiolosAnoikiscancercellular anchoragefocal adhesion kinase (FAK)GEF-H1matrixmetastasisp115-RhoGEFp52Shcp66ShcRasRhoAShc

Identifiers

PMID28632027
PMCPMC6343529
OpenAlexW2588762644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.