Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28631281›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Detecting large-scale networks in the human brain using high-density electroencephalography.

Quanying Liu, Seyedehrezvan Farahibozorg, Camillo Porcaro, Nicole Wenderoth, Dante Mantini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Navigating Pubertal Goldilocks: The Optimal Pace for Hierarchical Brain Organization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Quanying LiuNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Seyedehrezvan FarahibozorgDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, United Kingdom.
Camillo PorcaroLaboratory of Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Nicole WenderothNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Dante MantiniNeural Control of Movement Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-5559
ETH Zurich · CHMarche Polytechnic University · ITMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-density electroencephalography (hdEEG) is an emerging brain imaging technique that can be used to investigate fast dynamics of electrical activity in the healthy and the diseased human brain. Its applications are however currently limited by a number of methodological issues, among which the difficulty in obtaining accurate source localizations. In particular, these issues have so far prevented EEG studies from reporting brain networks similar to those previously detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Here, we report for the first time a robust detection of brain networks from resting state (256-channel) hdEEG recordings. Specifically, we obtained 14 networks previously described in fMRI studies by means of realistic 12-layer head models and exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA) source localization, together with independent component analysis (ICA) for functional connectivity analysis. Our analyses revealed three important methodological aspects. First, brain network reconstruction can be improved by performing source localization using the gray matter as source space, instead of the whole brain. Second, conducting EEG connectivity analyses in individual space rather than on concatenated datasets may be preferable, as it permits to incorporate realistic information on head modeling and electrode positioning. Third, the use of a wide frequency band leads to an unbiased and generally accurate reconstruction of several network maps, whereas filtering data in a narrow frequency band may enhance the detection of specific networks and penalize that of others. We hope that our methodological work will contribute to rise of hdEEG as a powerful tool for brain research. Hum Brain Mapp 38:4631-4643, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleGray MatterHeadHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, BiologicalNeural Pathwayselectroencephalographyfunctional connectivityhigh-density montageneuronal communicationresting state network

Identifiers

PMID28631281
PMCPMC6867042
OpenAlexW2953295210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.