ReviewSports medicine - open2017
The Validity and Responsiveness of Isometric Lower Body Multi-Joint Tests of Muscular Strength: a Systematic Review.
Review in Sports medicine - open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reliability of Muscle Strength and Muscle Power Assessments Using Isokinetic Dynamometry in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Systematic Review.Physical therapy · 2022Pooled it
- Five-year follow-up of the OptiTrain trial on concurrent resistance and high-intensity interval training during chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Two-year follow-up of the OptiTrain randomised controlled exercise trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Trial
- Article
- Does task experience moderate habituation effects in drop jumps? - An intra- and interday reliability and measurement error analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Exploring quality of life and physical-physiological characteristics in obese patients with and without lipedema: insights from the LipObes study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Associations Between Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull Peak Force and Functional and Cardiorespiratory Variables in Independent Older Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of Caffeine on Voluntary Force Estimation During Isometric Exercises.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Maximal and Explosive Strength of High-Level Alpine Skiers After Severe Lower Extremity Injury: A Retrospective Comparison with Non-Injured Skiers.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Developing and validating prediction models for low back pain and neck pain in office workers: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Use of Force Plate Technology to Measure Force Production Characteristics in Military Personnel: A Scoping Review of Methodological Reporting Practices.Sports medicine - open · 2025Review
- Development and performance verification of an isometric dynamometer for lower extremity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Protocol for a Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Applicability of Isometric Strength Training in Older Adults with Sarcopenia and Dynapenia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Real-Time Visual Feedback on Maximal Force Output and Reliability During Isometric MidThigh Pull Testing in Resistance-Trained Men.European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Are counter movement jump and isometric mid-thigh pull tests reliable, valid, and sensitive measurement instruments when performed after maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing? A sex-based analysis in elite athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- An Integrated Perspective of Effort and Perception of Effort.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Maximum strength and power as determinants of on-ice sprint performance in elite U16 to adult ice hockey players.Biology of sport · 2024Article
- Reliability of dynamic and isometric upper muscle strength testing in breast cancer survivors.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Maximal strength measurement: A critical evaluation of common methods-a narrative review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearchers and practitioners working in sports medicine and science require valid tests to determine the effectiveness of interventions and enhance understanding of mechanisms underpinning adaptation. Such decision making is influenced by the supportive evidence describing the validity of tests within current research. The objective of this study is to review the validity of lower body isometric multi-joint tests ability to assess muscular strength and determine the current level of supporting evidence.
methodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in a systematic fashion to search, assess and synthesize existing literature on this topic. Electronic databases such as Web of Science, CINAHL and PubMed were searched up to 18 March 2015. Potential inclusions were screened against eligibility criteria relating to types of test, measurement instrument, properties of validity assessed and population group and were required to be published in English. The Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to assess methodological quality and measurement property rating of included studies. Studies rated as fair or better in methodological quality were included in the best evidence synthesis.
resultsFifty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria for quality appraisal. The ten studies that rated fair or better in methodological quality were included in the best evidence synthesis. The most frequently investigated lower body isometric multi-joint tests for validity were the isometric mid-thigh pull and isometric squat. The validity of each of these tests was strong in terms of reliability and construct validity. The evidence for responsiveness of tests was found to be moderate for the isometric squat test and unknown for the isometric mid-thigh pull. No tests using the isometric leg press met the criteria for inclusion in the best evidence synthesis.
conclusionsResearchers and practitioners can use the isometric squat and isometric mid-thigh pull with confidence in terms of reliability and construct validity. Further work to investigate other validity components such as criterion validity, smallest detectable change and responsiveness to resistance exercise interventions may be beneficial to the current level of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.