Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28631234›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Quality Matters: Implementation Moderates Student Outcomes in the PATHS Curriculum.

Neil Humphrey, Alexandra Barlow, Ann Lendrum

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Influence of Classroom-Level Factors on Implementation Fidelity During Scale-up of Evidence-Based Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Effects of theFrontiers in psychology · 2022
    Article
  11. Does Training Modality Predict Fidelity of an Evidence-based Intervention Delivered in Schools?Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  12. Implementation Quality Impacts Fourth Grade Students' Participation in Physically Active Academic Lessons.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neil HumphreyManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. neil.humphrey@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8148-9500
Alexandra BarlowManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Ann LendrumManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/3006/01Public Health Research Programme 10/3006/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of the relationship between levels of implementation and outcomes of school-based social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions are relatively infrequent and are typically narrowly focused. Thus, our objective was to assess the relationship between variability in a range of implementation dimensions and intervention outcomes in the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) curriculum. Implementation of PATHS was examined in 69 classrooms across 23 schools in the first year of a major randomized controlled trial. Implementation data were generated via classroom-level structured observations. In addition to factual data on dosage and reach, exploratory factor analysis of observer ratings revealed two distinct implementation dimensions, namely, "quality and participant responsiveness" and "procedural fidelity." Student social-emotional skills, pro-social behavior, internalizing symptoms, and externalizing problems were captured through child self-report and teacher informant-report surveys (N = 1721). Hierarchical linear modeling of study data revealed that higher implementation quality and participant responsiveness was associated with significantly lower ratings of students' externalizing problems at 12-month follow-up. Conversely, and contrary to expectations, higher dosage was associated with significantly lower pro-social behavior and social-emotional skills at 12-month follow-up. No significant associations were found between variability in either procedural fidelity or reach and any intervention outcomes. The implications of these findings are discussed, and study limitations are noted.

Indexed as

CurriculumSocial LearningChildCluster AnalysisEnglandFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProgram EvaluationSchoolsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesImplementationInterventionOutcomesPathsSocial and emotional learning

Identifiers

PMID28631234
PMCPMC5801378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.